Hydra, what’s the big deal anyway?

RemObjects Hydra is a product I have used for years in concert with Delphi, and like most developers that come into contact with RemObjects products – once the full scope of the components hit you, you never want to go back to not using Hydra in your applications.

Note: It’s easy to dismiss Hydra as a “Delphi product”, but Hydra for .Net and Java does the exact same thing, namely let you mix and match modules from different languages in your programs. So if you are a C# developer looking for ways to incorporate Java, Delphi, Elements or Freepascal components in your application, then keep reading.

But let’s start with what Hydra can do for Delphi developers.

What is Hydra anyways?

Hydra is a component package for Delphi, Freepascal, .Net and Java that takes plugins to a whole new level. Now bear with me for a second, because these plugins is in a completely different league from anything you have used in the past.

In short, Hydra allows you to wrap code and components from other languages, and use them from Delphi or Lazarus. There are thousands of really amazing components for the .Net and Java platforms, and Hydra allows you compile those into modules (or “plugins” if you prefer that); modules that can then be used in your applications like they were native components.

Hydra, here using a C# component in a Delphi application

But it doesn’t stop there; you can also mix VCL and FMX modules in the same application. This is extremely powerful since it offers a clear path to modernizing your codebase gradually rather than doing a time consuming and costly re-write.

So if you want to move your aging VCL codebase to Firemonkey, but the cost of having to re-write all your forms and business logic for FMX would break your budget -that’s where Hydra gives you a second option: namely that you can continue to use your VCL code from FMX and refactor the application in your own tempo and with minimal financial impact.

The best of all worlds

Not long ago RemObjects added support for Lazarus (Freepascal) to the mix, which once again opens a whole new ecosystem that Delphi, C# and Java developers can benefit from. Delphi has a lot of really cool components, but Lazarus have components that are not always available for Delphi. There are some really good developers in the Freepascal community, and you will find hundreds of components and classes (if not thousands) that are open-source; For example, Lazarus has a branch of Synedit that is much more evolved and polished than the fork available for Delphi. And with Hydra you can compile that into a module / plugin and use it in your Delphi applications.

Check out a video on Hydra by Jim McKeeth

This is also true for Java and C# developers. Some of the components available for native languages might not have similar functionality in the .Net world, and by using Hydra you can tap into the wealth that native languages have to offer.

As a Delphi or Freepascal developer, perhaps you have seen some of the fancy grids C# and Java coders enjoy? Developer Express have some of the coolest components available for any platform, but their focus is more on .Net these days than Delphi. They do maintain the control packages they have, but compared to the amount of development done for C# their Delphi offerings are abysmal. So with Hydra you can tap into the .Net side of things and use the latest components and libraries in your Delphi applications.

Financial savings

One of coolest features of Hydra, is that you can use it across Delphi versions. This has helped me leverage the price-tag of updating to the latest Delphi.

It’s easy to forget that whenever you update Delphi, you also need to update the components you have bought. This was one of the reasons I was reluctant to upgrade my Delphi license until Embarcadero released Delphi 10.2. Because I had thousands of dollars invested in components – and updating all my licenses would cost a small fortune.

So to get around this, I put the components into a Hydra module and compiled that using my older Delphi. And then i simply used those modules from my new Delphi installation. This way I was able to cut cost by thousands of dollars and enjoy the latest Delphi.

Using Firemonkey controls under VCL is easy with Hydra

A couple of years back I also took the time to wrap a ton of older components that work fine but are no longer maintained or sold. I used an older version of Delphi to get these components into a Hydra module – and I can now use those with Delphi 10.3 (!). In my case there was a component-set for working closely with Active Directory that I have used in a customer’s project (and much faster than having to go the route via SQL). The company that made these don’t exist any more, and I have no source-code for the components.

The only way I could have used these without Hydra, would be to compile them into a .dll file and painstakingly export every single method (or use COM+ to cross the 32-bit / 64-bit barrier), which would have taken me a week since we are talking a large body of quality code. With Hydra i was able to wrap the whole thing in less than an hour.

I’m not advocating that people stop updating their components. But I am very thankful for the opportunity to delay having to update my entire component stack just to enjoy a modern version of Delphi.

Hydra gives me that opportunity, which means I can upgrade when my wallet allows it.

Building better applications

There is also another side to Hydra, namely that it allows you to design applications in a modular way. If you have the luxury of starting a brand new project and use Hydra from day one, you can isolate each part of your application as a module. Avoiding the trap of monolithic applications.

Hydra for .Net allows you to use Delphi, Java and FPC modules under C#

This way of working has great impact on how you maintain your software, and consequently how you issue hotfixes and updates. If you have isolated each key part of your application as separate modules, you don’t need to ship a full build every time.

This also safeguards you from having all your eggs in one basket. If you have isolated each form (for example) as separate modules, there is nothing stopping you from rewriting some of these forms in another language – or cross the VCL and FMX barrier. You have to admit that being able to use the latest components from Developer Express is pretty cool. There is not a shadow of a doubt that Developer-Express makes the best damn components around for any platform. There are many grids for Delphi, but they cant hold a candle to the latest and greatest from Developer Express.

Why can’t I just use packages?

If you are thinking “hey, this sounds exactly like packages, why should I buy Hydra when packages does the exact same thing?“. Actually that’s not how packages work for Delphi.

Delphi packages are cool, but they are also severely limited. One of the reasons you have to update your components whenever you buy a newer version of Delphi, is because packages are not backwards compatible.

Delphi packages are great, but severely limited

A Delphi package must be compiled with the same RTL as the host (your program), and version information and RTTI must match. This is because packages use the same RTL and more importantly, the same memory manager.

Hydra modules are not packages. They are clean and lean library files (*.dll files) that includes whatever RTL you compiled them with. In other words, you can safely load a Hydra module compiled with Delphi 7, into a Delphi 10.3 application without having to re-compile.

Once you start to work with Hydra, you gradually build up modules of functionality that you can recycle in the future. In many ways Hydra is a whole new take on components and RAD. This is how Delphi packages and libraries should have been.

Without saying anything bad about Delphi, because Delphi is a system that I love very much; but having to update your entire component stack just to use the latest Delphi, is sadly one of the factors that have led developers to abandon the platform. If you have USD 10.000 in dependencies, having to pay that as well as buying Delphi can be difficult to justify; especially when comparing with other languages and ecosystems.

For me, Hydra has been a tremendous boon for Delphi. It has allowed me to keep current with Delphi and all it’s many new features, without losing the money I have already invested in components packages.

If you are looking for something to bring your product to the next level, then I urge you to spend a few hours with Hydra. The documentation is exceptional, the features and benefits are outstanding — and you will wonder how you ever managed to work without them.

External resources

Disclaimer: I am not a salesman by any stretch of the imagination. I realize that promoting a product made by the company you work for might come across as a sales pitch; but that’s just it: I started to work for RemObjects for a reason. And that reason is that I have used their products since they came on the market. I have worked with these components long before I started working at RemObjects.

• Hydra website
• Hydra documentation
• Article: Mixing .Net and Java

.NetRocks, you made my day!

A popular website for .Net developers is called dot-net-rocks. This is an interesting site that has been going for a while now; well worth the visit if you do work with the .Net framework via RemObjects Elements, VS or Mono.

Now it turns out that the guys over at dot–net-rocks just did an episode on their podcast where they open by labeling me as a “raving lunatic” (I clearly have my moments); which I find absolutely hilarious, but not for the same reasons as them.

Long story short: They are doing a podcast on how to migrate legacy Delphi applications to C#, and in that context they somehow tracked down an article I posted way back in 2016, which was meant as a satire piece. Now don’t get me wrong, there are serious points in the article, like how the .Net framework was modeled on the Delphi VCL, and how the concepts around CLR and JIT were researched at Borland; but the tone of the whole thing, the “larger than life” claims etc. was meant to demonstrate just how some .Net developers behave when faced with alternative eco-systems. Having managed some 16+ usergroups for Delphi, C#, JavaScript (a total of six languages) on Facebook for close to 15 years, as well as working for Embarcadero that makes Delphi -I speak from experience.

It might be news to these guys that large companies around Europe is still using Delphi, modern Delphi, and that Object Pascal as a language scores well on the Tiobi index of popular programming languages. And no amount of echo-chamber mentality is going to change that fact. Heck, as late as 2018 and The Walt Disney Company wanted to replace C# with Delphi, because it turns out that bytecodes and embedded tech is not the best combination (cpu spikes when the GC kicks in, no real-time interrupt handling possible, GPIO delays, the list goes on).

I mean, the post i made back in 2016 is such obvious, low-hanging fruit for a show their size to pound on. You have this massive show that takes on a single, albeit ranting (and probably a bit of a lunatic if I don’t get my coffee) coder’s post. Underlying in the process how little they know about the object pascal community at large. They just demonstrated my point in bold, italic and underline 😀

Look before you shoot

DotNetRocks is either oblivious that Delphi still have millions of users around the world, or that Pascal is in fact available for .Net (which is a bit worrying since .Net is supposed to be their game). The alternative is that the facts I listed hit a little too close to home. I’ll leave it up to the reader to decide. Microsoft has lost at least 10 Universities around Europe to Delphi in 2018 that I know of, two of them Norwegian where I was personally involved in the license sales. While only speculation, I do find the timing for their podcast and focus on me in particular to be, “curious”.

And for the record, the most obvious solution when faced with “that legacy Delphi project”, is to just go and buy a modern version of Delphi. DotNetRocks delivered a perfect example of that very arrogance my 2016 post was designed to convey; namely that “brogrammers” often act like Delphi 7 was the last Delphi. They also resorted to lies to sell their points: I never said that Anders was dogged for creating Delphi. Quite the opposite. I simply underlined that by ridiculing Delphi in one hand, and praising it’s author with the other – you are indirectly (and paradoxically) invalidating half his career. Anders is an awesome developer, but why exclude how he evolved his skills? Ofcourse Ander’s products will have his architectural signature on them.

Not once did they mention Embarcadero or the fact that Delphi has been aggressively developed since Borland kicked the bucket. Probably hoping that undermining the messenger will somehow invalidate the message.

Porting Delphi to C# manually? Ok.. why not install Elements and just compile it into an assembly? You don’t even have to leave Visual Studio

Also, such an odd podcast for professional developers to run with. I mean, who the hell converts a Delphi project to C# manually? It’s like listening to a graphics artist that dont know that Photoshop and Illustrator are the de-facto tools to use. How is that even possible? A website dedicated to .Net, yet with no insight into the languages that run on the CLR? Wow.

If you want to port something from Delphi to .Net, you don’t sit down and manually convert stuff. You use proper tools like Elements from RemObjects; This gives you Object-Pascal for .Net (so a lot of code will compile just fine with only minor changes). Elements also ships with source-conversion tools, so once you have it running under Oxygene Pascal (the dialect is called Oxygene) you either just use the assemblies — or convert the Pascal code to C# through a tool called an Oxidizer.

The most obvious solution is to just upgrade to a Delphi version from this century

The other solution is to use Hydra, also a RemObjects product. They can then compile the Delphi code into a library (including visual parts like forms and frames), and simply use that as any other assembly from within C#. This allows you to gradually phase out older parts without breaking the product. You can also use C# assemblies from Delphi with Hydra.

So by all means, call me what you like. You have only proved my point so far. You clearly have zero insight into the predominant Object-Pascal eco-systems, you clearly don’t know the tools developers use to interop between arcetypical and contextual languages — and instead of fact checking some of the points I made, dry humor notwithstanding, you just reacted like brogrammers do.

Well, It’s been weeks since I laughed this hard 😀 You really need to check before you pick someone to verbally abuse on the first date, because you might just bite yourself in the arse here he he

Cheers

 

Using multiple languages is the same project

Most compilers can only handle a single syntax for any project, but the Elements compiler from RemObjects deals with 5 (five!) different languages -even within the same project. That’s pretty awesome and opens up for some considerable savings.

I mean, it’s not always easy to find developers for a single language, but when you can approach your codebase from C#, Java, Go, Swift and Oxygene (object pascal) at the same time (inside the same project even!), you suddenly have some options.  Especially since you can pick exotic targets like WebAssembly. Or what about compiling Java to .net bytecodes? Or using the VCL from C#? It’s pretty awesome stuff!

Check out Marc Hoffmans article on the Elements compiler toolchain and how you can mix and match between languages, picking the best from each — while still compiling to a single binary of llvm optimized code:

Click on the picture to be redirected

 

Check out RemObjects Remoting SDK

RemObjects Remoting SDK is one of those component packages that have become more than the sum of it’s part. Just like project Jedi has become standard equipment almost, Remoting SDK is a system that all Delphi and Freepascal developers should have in their toolbox.

In this article I’m going to present the SDK in broad strokes; from a viewpoint of someone who haven’t used the SDK before. There are still a large number of Delphi developers that don’t know it even exists – hopefully this post will shed some light on why the system is worth every penny and what it can do for you.

I should also add, that this is a personal blog. This is not an official RemObjects presentation, but a piece written by me based on my subjective experience and notions. We have a lot of running dialog at Delphi Developer on Facebook, so if I read overly harsh on a subject, that is my personal view as a Delphi Developer.

Stop re-inventing the wheel

Delphi has always been a great tool for writing system services. It has accumulated a vast ecosystem of non-visual components over the years, both commercial and non-commercial, and this allows developers to quickly aggregate and expose complex behavior — everything from graphics processing to databases, file processing to networking.

The challenge for Delphi is that writing large composite systems, where you have more than a single service doing work in concert, is not factored into the RTL or project type. Delphi provides a bare-bone project type for system services, and that’s it. Depending on how you look at it, it’s either a blessing or a curse. You essentially start on C level.

So fundamental things like IPC (inter process communication) is something you have to deal with yourself. If you want multi-tenancy that is likewise not supported out of the box. And all of this is before we venture into protocol standards, message formats and async vs synchronous execution.

The idea behind Remoting SDK is to get away from this style of low-level hacking. Without sounding negative, it provides the missing pieces that Delphi lacks, including the stuff that C# developers enjoy under .net (and then some). So if you are a Delphi developer who look over at C# with smudge of envy, then you are going to love Remoting SDK.

Say goodbye to boilerplate mistakes

Writing distributed servers and services is boring work. For each function you expose, you have to define the parameters and data-types in a portable way, then you have to implement the code that represents the exposed function and finally the interface itself that can be consumed by clients. The latter must be defined in a way that works with other languages too, not just Delphi. So while server tech in it’s essential form is quite simple, it’s the infrastructure that sets the stage of how quickly you can apply improvements and adapt to change.

For example, let’s say you have implemented a wonderful new service. It exposes 60 awesome functions that your customers can consume in their own work. The amount of boilerplate code for 60 distributed functions, especially if you operate with composite data types, is horrendous. It is a nightmare to manage and opens up for sloppy, unnecessary mistakes.

After you install Remoting SDK, the service designer becomes a part of the IDE

This is where Remoting SDK truly shines. When you install the software, it integrates it’s editors and wizards closely with the Delphi IDE. It adds a ton of new project types, components and whatnot – but the most important feature is without a doubt the service designer.

Start the service-designer in any server or service project and you can edit the methods, data types and interfaces your system expose to the world

As the name implies, the service designer allows you to visually define your services. Adding a new function is a simple click, the same goes for datatypes and structures (record types). These datatypes are exposed too and can be consumed from any modern language. So a service you make in Delphi can be used from C#, C/C++, Java, Oxygene, Swift (and visa-versa).

Auto generated code

A service designer is all good and well I hear you say, but what about that boilerplate code? Well Remoting SDK takes care of that too (kinda the point). Whenever you edit your services, the designer will auto-generate a new interface unit for you. This contains the classes and definitions that describe your service. It will also generate an implementation unit, with empty functions; you just need to fill in the blanks.

The designer is also smart enough not to remove code. So if you go in and change something, it won’t just delete the older implementation procedure. Only the params and names will be changed if you have already written some code.

Having changed a service, hitting F9 re-generates the interface code automatically. Your only job is to fill in the code for each method in the implementation units. The SDK takes care of everything else for you

The service information, including the type information, is stored in a special file format called “rodl”. This format is very close to Microsoft WSDL format, but it holds more information. It’s important to underline that you can import the service directly from your servers (optional naturally) as WSDL. So if you want to consume a Remoting SDK service using Delphi’s ordinary RIO components, that is not a problem. Visual Studio likewise imports and consumes services – so Remoting SDK behaves identical regardless of platform or language used.

Remoting SDK is not just for Delphi, just to be clear on that. If you are presently using both Delphi and C# (which is a common situation), you can buy a license for both C# and Delphi and use whatever language you feel is best for a particular task or service. You can even get Remoting SDK for Javascript and call your service-stack directly from your website if you like. So there are a lot of options for leveraging the technology.

Transport is not content

OK so Remoting SDK makes it easy to define distributed services and servers. But what about communication? Are we boxed into RemObjects way of doing things?

The remoting framework comes with a ton of components, divided into 3 primary groups:

• Servers
• Channels (clients)
• Messages

The reason for this distinction is simple: the ability to transport data, is never the same as the ability to describe data. For example, a message is always connected to a standard. It’s job is ultimately to serialize (represent) and de-serialize data according to a format. The server’s job is to receive a request and send a response. So these concepts are neatly decoupled for maximum agility.

As of writing the SDK offers the following message formats:

• Binary
• Post
• SOAP
• JSON

If you are exposing a service that will be consumed from JavaScript, throwing in a TROJSONMessage component is the way to go. If you expect messages to be posted from your website using ordinary web forms, then TROPostMessage is a perfect match. If you want XML then TROSOAPMessage rocks, and if you want fast, binary messages – well then there is TROBinaryMessage.

What you must understand is that you don’t have to pick just one! You can drop all 4 of these message formats and hook them up to your server or channel. The SDK is smart enough to recognize the format and use the correct component for serialization. So creating a distributed service that can be consumed from all major platforms is a matter of dropping components and setting a property.

If you double-click on a server or channel, you can link message components with a simple click. No messy code snippets in sight.

Multi-tenancy out of the box

With the release of Rad-Server as a part of Delphi, people have started to ask what exactly multi-tenancy is and why it matters. I have to be honest and say that yes, it does matter if you are creating a service stack where you want to isolate the logic for each customer in compartments – but the idea that this is somehow new or unique is not the case. Remoting SDK have given users multi-tenancy support for 15+ years, which is also why I haven’t been too enthusiastic with Rad-Server.

Now don’t get me wrong, I don’t have an axe to grind with Rad-Server. The only reason I mention it is because people have asked how i feel about it. The tech itself is absolutely welcome, but it’s the licensing and throwing Interbase in there that rubs me the wrong way. If it could run on SQLite3 and was free with Enterprise I would have felt different about it.

There are various models for multi-tenancy, but they revolve around the same principles

To get back on topic: multi-tenancy means that you can dynamically load services and expose them on demand. You can look at it as a form of plugin functionality. The idea in Rad-Server is that you can isolate a customer’s service in a separate package – and then load the package into your server whenever you need it.

Some of the components that ship with the system

The reason I dislike Rad-Server in this respect, is because they force you to compile with packages. So if you want to write a Rad-Server system, you have to compile your entire project as package-based, and ship a ton of .dpk files with your system. Packages is not wrong or bad per-se, but they open your system up on a fundamental level. There is nothing stopping a customer from rolling his own spoof package and potentially bypass your security.

There is also an issue with un-loading a package, where right now the package remains in memory. This means that hot-swapping packages without killing the server wont work.

Rad-Server is also hardcoded to use Interbase, which suddenly bring in licensing issues that rubs people the wrong way. Considering the price of Delphi in 2019, Rad-Server stands out as a bit of an oddity. And hardcoding a database into it, with the licensing issues that brings -just rendered the whole system mute for me. Why should I pay more to get less? Especially when I have been using multi-tenancy with RemObjects for some 15 years?

With Remoting SDK you have something called DLL servers, which does the exact same thing – but using ordinary DLL files (not packages!). You don’t have to compile your system with packages, and it takes just one line of code to make your main dispatcher aware of the loaded service.

This actually works so well that I use Remoting SDK as my primary “plugin” system. Even when I write ordinary desktop applications that has nothing to do with servers or services – I always try to compartmentalize features that could be replaced in the future.

For example, I’m a huge fan of ElevateDB, which is a native Delphi database engine that compiles directly into your executable. By isolating that inside a DLL as a service, my application is now engine agnostic – and I get a break from buying a truck load of components every time Delphi is updated.

Saving money

The thing about DLL services, is that you can save a lot of money. I’m actually using an ElevateDB license that was for Delphi 2007. I compiled the engine using D2007 into a DLL service — and then I consume that DLL from my more modern Delphi editions. I have no problem supporting or paying for components, that is right and fair, but having to buy new licenses for every single component each time Delphi is updated? This is unheard of in other languages, and I would rather ditch the platform all together than forking out $10k ever time I update.

A DLL server can be used for many things if you are creative about it

While we are on the subject – Hydra is another great money saver. It allows you to use .net and Java libraries (both visual and non-visual) with Delphi. With Hydra you can design something in .net, compile it into a DLL file, and then use that from Delphi.

But — you can also compile things from Delphi, and use it in newer versions of Delphi. Im not forking out for a Developer Express update just to use what I have already paid for in the latest Delphi. I have one license, I compile the forms and components into a Hydra Module — and then use it from newer Delphi editions.

Hydra, which is a separate product, allows you to stuff visual components and forms inside a vanilla DLL. It allows cross  language use, so you can finally use Java and .net components inside your Delphi application

Bonjour support

Another feature I love is the zero configuration support. This is one of those things that you often forget, but that suddenly becomes important once you deploy a service stack on cluster level.

Remoting SDK comes with support for Apple Bonjour, so if you want to use that functionality you have to install the Bonjour library from Apple. Once installed on your host machines, your RemObjects services can find each other.

ZeroConfig is not that hard to code manually. You can roll your own using UDP or vanilla messages. But getting service discovery right can be fiddly. One thing is broadcasting an UDP message saying “here I am”, it’s something else entirely to allow service discovery on cluster level.

If Bonjour is not your cup of tea, the SDK provides a second option, which is RemObjects own zero-config hub. You can dig into the documentation to find out more about this.

What about that IPC stuff you mentioned?

I mentioned IPC (inter process communication) at the beginning here, which is a must have if you are making a service stack where each member is expected to talk to the others. In a large server-system the services might not exist on the same, physical hardware either, so you want to take height for that.

With the SDK this is just another service. It takes 10 minutes to create a DLL server with the functionality to send and receive messages – and then you just load and plug that into all your services. Done. Finished.

Interestingly, Remoting SDK supports named-pipes. So if you are running on a Windows network it’s even easier. Personally I prefer to use a vanilla TCP/IP based server and channel, that way I can make use of my Linux blades too.

Building on the system

There is nothing stopping you from expanding the system that RemObjects have established. You are not forced to only use their server types, message types and class framework. You can mix and match as you see fit – and also inherit out your own variation if you need something special.

For example, WebSocket is an emerging standard that has become wildly popular. Remoting SDK does not support that out of the box, the reason is that the standard is practically identical to the RemObjects super-server, and partly because there must be room for third party vendors.

Andre Mussche took the time to implement a WebSocket server for Remoting SDK a few years back. Demonstrating in the process just how easy it is to build on the existing infrastructure. If you are already using Remoting SDK or want WebSocket support, head over to his github repository and grab the code there: https://github.com/andremussche/DelphiWebsockets

I could probably write a whole book covering this framework. For the past 15 years, RemObjects Remoting SDK is the first product I install after Delphi. It has become standard for me and remains an integral part of my toolkit. Other packages have come and gone, but this one remains.

Hopefully this post has tickled your interest in the product. No matter if you are maintaining a legacy service stack, or thinking about re implementing your existing system in something future-proof, this framework will make your life much, much easier. And it wont break the bank either.

You can visit the product page here: https://www.remotingsdk.com/ro/default.aspx

And you can check out the documentation here: https://docs.remotingsdk.com/

30% discount on all RemObjects products!

This is brilliant. RemObjects is giving a whopping 30% discount on all products!

This means you can now pick up RemObjects Remoting Framework, Data Abstract, Hydra or the Elements compiler toolchain – with a massive 30% saving!

These are battle-hardened, enterprise level solutions that have been polished over years and they are in constant development. Each solution integrates seamlessly into Embarcadero Delphi and provides a smooth path to delivering quality products in days rather than weeks.

But you better hurry because it’s only valid for one week (!)

Use the coupon code: “DelphiDeveloper”

Use the Delphi Developer coupon to get 30% discount – click here

 

Calling node.js from Delphi

We got a good question about how to start a node.js program from Delphi on our Facebook group today (third one in a week?). When you have been coding for years you often forget that things like this might not be immediately obvious. Hopefully I can shed some light on the options in this post.

Node or chrome?

Just to be clear: node.js has nothing to do with chrome or chromium embedded. Chrome is a web-browser, a completely visual environment and ecosystem.

Node.js is the complete opposite. It is purely a shell based environment, meaning that it’s designed to run services and servers, with emphasis on the latter.

The only thing node.js and chrome have in common, is that they both use the V8 JavaScript runtime engine to load, JIT compile and execute scripts at high speed. Beyond that, they are utterly alien to each other.

Can node.js be embedded into a Delphi program?

Technically there is nothing stopping a C/C++ developer from compiling the node.js core system as C++ builder compatible .obj files; files that can then be linked into a Delphi application through references. But this also requires a bit of scaffolding, like adding support for malloc_, free_ and a few other procedures – so that your .obj files uses the same memory manager as your Delphi code. But until someone does just that and publish it, im afraid you are stuck with two options:

• Use a library called Toby, that keeps node.js in a single DLL file. This is the most practical way if you insist on hosting your own version of node.js
• Add node.js as a prerequisite and give users the option to locate the node.exe in your application’s preferences. This is the way I would go, because you really don’t want to force users to stick with your potentially outdated or buggy build.

So yes, you can use toby and just add the toby dll file to your program folder, but I have to strongly advice against that. There is no point setting yourself up for maintaining a whole separate programming language, just because you want JavaScript support.

“How many in your company can write high quality WebAssembly modules?”

If all you want to do is support JavaScript in your application, then I would much rather install Besen into Delphi. Besen is a JavaScript runtime engine written in Freepascal. It is fully compatible with Delphi, and follows the ECMA standard to the letter. So it is extremely compatible, fast and easy to use.

Like all Delphi components Besen is compiled into your application, so you have no dependencies to worry about.

Starting a node.js script

The easiest way to start a node.js script, is to simply shell-execute out of your Delphi application. This can be done as easily as:

ShellExecute(Handle, 'open', PChar('node.exe'), pchar('script.js'), nil, SW_SHOW);

This is more than enough if you just want to start a service, server or do some work that doesn’t require that you capture the result.

If you need to capture the result, the data that your node.js program emits on stdout, there is a nice component in the Jedi Component Library. Also plenty of examples online on how to do that.

If you need even further communication, you need to look for a shell-execute that support pipes. All node.js programs have something called a message-channel in the Javascript world. In reality though, this is just a named pipe that is automatically created when your script starts (with the same moniker as the PID [process identifier]).

If you opt for the latter you have a direct, full duplex message channel directly into your node.js application. You just have to agree with yourself on a protocol so that your Delphi code understands what node.js is saying, and visa versa.

UDP or TCP

If you don’t want to get your hands dirty with named pipes and rolling your own protocol, you can just use UDP to let your Delphi application communicate with your node.js process. UDP is practically without cost since its fundamental to all networking stacks, and in your case you will be shipping messages purely between processes on localhost. Meaning: packets are never sent on the network, but rather delegated between processes on the same machine.

In that case, I suggest you ship in the port you want your UDP server to listen on, so that your node.js service acts as the server. A simple command-line statement like:

node.exe myservice.js 8090

Inside node.js you can setup an UDP server with very little fuzz:

function setupServer(port) {
  var os = require("os");
  var dgram = require("dgram");
  var socket = dgram.createSocket("udp4");

  var MULTICAST_HOST = "224.0.0.236";
  var BROADCAST_HOST = "255.255.255.255";
  var ALL_PORT = 60540;
  var MULTICAST_TTL = 1; // Local network

  socket.bind(port);
  socket.on('listening', function() {
    socket.setMulticastLoopback(true);
    socket.setMulticastTTL(MULTICAST_TTL);
    socket.addMembership(multicastHost);
    if(broadcast) { socket.setBroadcast(true); }
  });
  socket.on('message', parseMessage);
}

function parseMessage(message, rinfo) {
try {
  var messageObject = JSON.parse(message);
  var eventType = messageObject.eventType;
  } catch(e) {
  }
}

Note: the code above assumes a JSON text message.

You can then use any Delphi UDP client to communicate with your node.js server, Indy is good, Synapse is a good library with less overhead – there are many options here.

Do I have to learn Javascript to use node.js?

If you download DWScript you can hook-up the JS-codegen library (see library folder in the DWScript repository), and use that to compile DWScript (object pascal) to kick-ass Javascript. This is the same compiler that was used in Smart Mobile Studio.

“Adding WebAssembly to your resume is going to be a hell of a lot more valuable in the years to come than C# or Java”

Another alternative is to use Freepascal, they have a pas2js project where you can compile ordinary object-pascal to javascript. Naturally there are a few things to keep in mind, both for DWScript and Freepascal – like avoiding pointers. But clean object pascal compiles just fine.

If JavaScript is not your cup of tea, or you simply don’t have time to learn the delicate nuances between the DOM (document object model, used by browsers) and the 100% package oriented approach deployed by node.js — then you can just straight up to webassembly.

RemObjects Software has a kick-ass webassembly compiler, perfect if you dont have the energy or time to learn JavaScript. As of writing this is the fastest and most powerful toolchain available. And I have tested them all.

WebAssembly, no Javascript needed

You might remember Oxygene? It used to be shipped with Delphi as a way to target Microsoft CLR (common language runtime) and the .net framework.

Since then Oxygene and the RemObjects toolchain has evolved dramatically and is now capable of a lot more than CLR support.

• You can compile to raw, llvm optimized machine code for 8 platforms
• You can compile to CLR/.Net
• You can compile to Java bytecodes
• You can compile to WebAssembly!

WebAssembly is not Javascript, it’s important to underline that. WebAssembly was created especially for developers using traditional languages, so that traditional compilers can emit web friendly, binary code. Unlike Javascript, WebAssembly is a purely binary format. Just like Delphi generates machine-code that is linked into a final executable, WebAssembly is likewise compiled, linked and emitted in binary form.

If that sounds like a sales pitch, it’s not. It’s a matter of practicality.

• WebAssembly is completely barren out of the box. The runtime environment, be it V8 for the browser or V8 for node.js, gives you nothing out of the box. You don’t even have WriteLn() to emit text.
• Google expects compiler makers to provide their own RTL functions, from the fundamental to the advanced. The only thing V8 gives you, is a barebone way of referencing objects and functions on the other side, meaning the JS and DOM world. And that’s it.

So the reason i’m talking a lot about Oxygene and RemObjects Elements (Elements is the name of the compiler toolchain RemObjects offers), is because it ships with an RTL. So you are not forced to start on actual, literal assembly level.

If you don’t want to study JavaScript, Oxygene and Elements from RemObjects is the solution

RemObjects also delivers a DelphiVCL compatibility framework. This is a clone of the Delphi VCL / Freepascal LCL. Since WebAssembly is still brand new, work is being done on this framework on a daily basis, with updates being issued all the time.

Note: The Delphi VCL framework is not just for WebAssembly. It represents a unified framework that can work anywhere. So if you switch from WebAssembly to say Android, you get the same result.

The most important part of the above, is actually not the visual stuff. I mean, having HTML5 visual controls is cool – but chances are you want to use a library like Sencha, SwiftUI or jQueryUI to compose your forms right? Which means you just want to interface with the widgets in the DOM to set and get values.

You probably want to use a fancy UI library, like jQuery UI. This works perfectly with Elements because you can reference the controls from your WebAssembly module. You dont have to create TButton, TListbox etc manually

The more interesting stuff is actually the non-visual code you get access to. Hundreds of familiar classes from the VCL, painstakingly re-created, and usable from any of the 5 languages Elements supports.

You can check it out here: https://github.com/remobjects/DelphiRTL

Skipping JavaScript all together

I dont believe in single languages. Not any more. There was a time when all you needed was Delphi and a diploma and you were set to conquer the world. But those days are long gone, and a programmer needs to be flexible and have a well stocked toolbox.

Knowing where you want to be is half the journey

The world really don’t need yet-another-c# developer. There are millions of C# developers in India alone. C# is just “so what?”. Which is also why C# jobs pays less than Delphi or node.js system service jobs.

What you want, is to learn the things others avoid. If JavaScript looks alien and you feel uneasy about the whole thing – that means you are growing as a developer. All new things are learned by venturing outside your comfort zone.

How many in your company can write high quality WebAssembly modules?

How many within one hour driving distance from your office or home are experts at WebAssembly? How many are capable of writing industrial scale, production ready system services for node.js that can scale from a single instance to 1000 instances in a large, clustered cloud environment?

Any idiot can pick up node.js and knock out a service, but with your background from Delphi or C++ builder you have a massive advantage. All those places that can throw an exception that JS devs usually ignore? As a Delphi or Oxygene developer you know better. And when you re-apply that experience under a different language, suddenly you can do stuff others cant. Which makes your skills valuable.

The Quartex Media Desktop have made even experienced node / web developers gasp. They are not used to writing custom-controls and large-scale systems, which is my advantage

So would you learn JavaScript or just skip to WebAssembly? Honestly? Learn a bit of both. You don’t have to be an expert in JavaScript to compliment WebAssembly. Just get a cheap book, like “Node.js for beginners” and “JavaScript the good parts” ($20 a piece) and that should be more than enough to cover the JS side of things.

Adding WebAssembly to your resume and having the material to prove you know your stuff, is going to be a hell of a lot more valuable in the years to come than C#, Java or Python. THAT I can guarantee you.

And, we have a wicked cool group on Facebook you can join too: Click here to visit RemObjects Developer.

 

Getting into Node.js from Delphi

Delphi is one of the best development toolchains for Windows. I have been an avid fan of Delphi since it was first released, and before that – Turbo Pascal too. Delphi has a healthy following – and despite popular belief, Delphi scores quite well on the Tiobe Index.

As cool and efficient as Delphi might be, there are situations where native code wont work. Or at the very least, be less efficient than the alternatives. Delphi has a broad wingspan, from low-level assembler all the way to classes and generics. But JavaScript and emerging web technology is based on a completely different philosophy, one where native code is regarded as negative since it binds you to hardware.

Getting to grips with the whole JavaScript phenomenon, be it for mobile, embedded or back-end services, can be daunting if all you know is native code. But thankfully there are alternatives that can help you become productive quickly, something I will brush over in this post.

JavaScript without JavaScript

Before we dig into the tools of the trade, I want to cover alternative ways of enjoying the power of node.js and Javascript. Namely by using compilers that can convert code from a traditional language – and emit fully working JavaScript. There are a lot more options than you think:

Quartex Media Desktop is a complete environment written purely in JavaScript. Both Server, Cluster and front-end is pure JavaScript. A good example of what can be done.

• Swift compiles for JavaScript, and Apple is doing some amazing things with the new and sexy SwiftUI tookit. If you know your way around Swift, you can compile for Javascript
• Go can likewise be compiled to JS:
  • RemObjects Elements supports the Go language. Elements can target both native (llvm), .Net, Java and WebAssembly.
  • Go2Js
  • GopherJs
  • TARDISgo
• C/C++ can be compiled to asm.js courtesy of EmScripten. It uses clang to first compile your code to llvm bitcode, and then it converts that into asm.js. You have probably seen games like Quake run in the browser? That was asm.js, a kind of precursor to WebAssembly.
• NS Basic compiles for JavaScript, this is a Visual Basic 6 style environment with its own IDE even

For those coming straight from Delphi, there are a couple of options to pick from:

• Freepascal (pas2js project)
• DWScript compiles code to JavaScript, this is the same compiler that we used in Smart Pascal earlier
• Oxygene, the next generation object-pascal from RemObjects compiles to WebAssembly. This is by far the best option of them all.

I strongly urge you to have a look at Elements, here running in Visual Studio

JavaScript, Asm.js or WebAssembly?

Asm.js is by far the most misunderstood technology in the JavaScript ecosystem, so let me just cover that before we move on:

A few years back JavaScript gained support for memory buffers and typed arrays. This might not sound very exciting, but in terms of speed – the difference is tremendous. The default variable type in JavaScript is what Delphi developers know as Variant. It assumes the datatype of the values you assign to it. Needless to say, there is a lot of overhead when working with variants – so JavaScript suddenly getting proper typed arrays was a huge deal.

It was then discovered that JavaScript could manipulate these arrays and buffers at high speed, providing it only used a subset of the language. A subset that the JavaScript runtime could JIT compile more easily (turn into machine-code).

So what the EmScripten team did was to implement a bytecode based virtual-machine in Javascript, and then they compile C/C++ to bytecodes. I know, it’s a huge project, but the results speak for themselves — before WebAssembly, this was as fast as it got with JavaScript.

WebAssembly

WebAssembly is different from both vanilla JavaScript and Asm.js. First of all, it’s executed at high speed by the browser itself. Not like asm.js where these bytecodes were executed by JavaScript code.

Water is a fast, slick and platform independent IDE for Elements. The same IDE for OS X is called Fire. You can use RemObjects Elements from either Visual Studio or Water

Secondly, WebAssembly is completely JIT compiled by the browser or node.js when loading. It’s not like Asm.js where some parts are compiled, others are interpreted. WebAssembly runs at full speed and have nothing to do with traditional JavaScript. It’s actually a completely separate engine.

Out of all the options on the table, WebAssembly is the technology with the best performance.

Kits and strategies

The first thing you need to be clear about, is what you want to work with. The needs and requirements of a game developer will be very different from a system service developer.

Here are a couple of kits to think about:

• Mobile developer
  • Implement your mobile applications using Oxygene, compiling for WebAssembly (Elements)
  • RemObjects Remoting SDK for client / server communication
  • Use Freepascal for vanilla JavaScript scaffolding when needed
• Service developer
  • Implement libraries in Oxygene to benefit from the speed of WebAssembly
  • Use RemObjects Data Abstract to make data-access uniform and fast
  • Use Freepascal for boilerplate node.js logic
• Desktop developer
  • For platform independent desktop applications, WebAssembly is the way to go. You will need some scaffolding (plain Javascript) to communicate with the application host  – but the 99.9% of your code will be better under WebAssembly.
  • Use Cordova / Phonegap to “bundle” your WebAssembly, HTML5 files and CSS styling into a single, final executable.

The most important part to think about when getting into JavaScript, is to look closely at the benefits and limitation of each technology.

WebAssembly is fast, wicked fast, and let’s you write code like you are used to from Delphi. Things like pointers etc are supported in Elements, which means ordinary code that use pointers will port over with ease. You are also not bound on hand-and-feet to a particular framework.

For example, EmScripten for C/C++ have almost nothing in terms of UI functionality. The visual part is a custom build of SDL (simple directmedia layer), which fakes the graphics onto an ordinary HTML5 canvas. This makes EmScripten a good candidate for porting games written in C/C++ to the web — but it’s less than optimal for writing serious applications.

Setting up the common tools

So far we have looked at a couple of alternatives for getting into the wonderful world of JavaScript in lieu of other languages. But what if you just want to get started with the typical tools JS developers use?

Visual Studio Code is a pretty amazing code-editor

The first “must have” is Visual Studio Code. This is actually a great example of what you can achieve with JavaScript, because the entire editor and program is written in JavaScript. But I want to stress that this editor is THE editor to get. The way you work with files in JS is very different from Delphi, C# and Java. JavaScript projects are often more fragmented, with less code in each file – organized by name.

TypeScript was invented by Anders Hejlsberg, who also made Delphi and C#

The next “must have” is without a doubt TypeScript. Personally im not too fond of TypeScript, but if ordinary JavaScript makes your head hurt and you want classes and ordinary inheritance, then TypeScript is a step up.

Next on the list is AssemblyScript. This is a post-processor for TypeScript that converts your code into WebAssembly. It lacks much of the charm and elegance of Oxygene, but I suspect that has to do with old habits. When you have been reading object-pascal for 20 years, you feel more at home there.

You will also need to install node.js, which is the runtime engine for running JavaScript as services. Node.js is heavily optimized for writing server software, but it’s actually a brilliant way to write services that are multi-platform. Because Node.js delivers the same behavior regardless of underlying operating system.

And finally, since you definitely want to convert your JavaScript and/or WebAssembly into a stand-alone executable: you will need Adobe Phonegap.

Visual Studio

No matter if you want to enter JavaScript via Elements or something else, Visual Studio will save you a lot of time, especially if you plan on targeting Azure or Amazon services. Downloading and installing the community edition is a good idea, and you can use that while exploring your options.

When it comes to writing system services, you also want to check out NPM, the node.js package manager. The JavaScript ecosystem is heavily package oriented – and npm gives you some 800.000 packages to play with free of charge.

Just to be clear, npm is a shell command you use to install or remove packages. NPM is also a online repository of said packages, where you can search and find what you need. Most packages are hosted on github, but when you install a package locally into your application folder – npm figures out dependencies etc. automatically for you.

Books, glorious books

Last but not least, get some good books. Seriously, it will save you so much time and frustration. Amazon have tons of great books, be it vanilla JavaScript, TypeScript, Node.js — pick some good ones and take the time to consume the material.

And again, I strongly urge you to have a look at Elements when it comes to WebAssembly. WebAssembly is a harsh and barren canvas, and being able to use the Elements RTL is a huge boost.

But regardless of path you pick, you will always benefit from learning vanilla JavaScript.

 

RemObjects VCL, mind blown!

For a guy that spends most of his time online, and can talk for hours about the most nerdy topics known to mankind – being gobsmacked and silenced is a rare event. But this morning that was exactly what happened.

Now, Marc Hoffman has blogged regularly over the years regarding the evolution of the RemObjects toolchain; explaining how they decoupled the parts that make up a programming language, such as syntax, rtl and target, but I must admit haven’t really digested the full implications of that work.

Like most developers I have kept my eyes on the parts relevant for me, like the Remoting SDK, Data Abstract and Javascript support. Before I worked at Embarcadero I pretty much spent 10 years contracting -and building Smart Mobile Studio on the side together with the team at The Smart Company Inc.

Smart Pascal gained support for RemObjects SDK servers quite early

Since both the Remoting SDK and Data Abstract were part of our toolbox as Delphi developers, those were naturally more immediate than anything else. We also added support for RemObjects Remoting SDK inside Smart Mobile Studio, so that people could call existing services from their Javascript applications.

Oxygene then

Like most Delphi developers I remember testing Oxygene Pascal when I bought Delphi 2005. Back then Oxygene was licensed by Borland under the “Prism” name and represented their take on dot net support. I was very excited when it came out, but since my knowledge of the dot net framework was nil, I was 100% relient on the documentation.

In many ways Oxygene was a victim of Rad Studio’s abhorrent help-file system. Documentation for Rad Studio (especially Delphi) up to that point had been exemplary since Delphi 4; but by the time Rad Studio 2005 came out, the bloat had reached epic levels. Even for me as a die-hard Delphi fanatic, Delphi 2005 and 2006 was a tragic experience.

Removing Oxygene was a monumental mistake

I mean, when it takes 15 minutes (literally) just to open the docs, then learning a whole new programming paradigm under those conditions was quite frankly impossible. Like most Delphi developers I was used to Delphi 7 style documentation, where the docs were not just reference material – but actually teaches you the language itself.

In the end Oxygene remained very interesting, but with a full time job, deadlines and kids to take care of, I stuck to what I knew – namely the VCL.

Oxygene today

Just like Delphi has evolved and improved radically since 2005, Oxygene has likewise evolved above and beyond its initial form. Truth be told, we copied a lot of material from Oxygene when we made Smart Pascal, so I feel strangely at home with Oxygene even after a couple of days. The documentation for Oxygene Pascal (and Elements as a whole) is very good: https://docs.elementscompiler.com/Oxygene/

But Oxygene Pascal, while the obvious “first stop” for Delphi developers looking to expand their market impact, is more than “just a language”. It’s a language that is a part of a growing family of languages that RemObjects support and evolve.

As of writing RemObjects offers the following languages. So even if you don’t have a background in Delphi, or perhaps migrated from Delphi to C# years ago – RemObjects will have solutions and benefits to offer:

• Oxygene (object pascal)
• C#
• Swift
• Java

Water is a sexy, slim new IDE for RemObjects languages on Windows. For the OS X version you want to download Fire.

And here is the cool thing: when you hear “Java” you automatically expect that you are bound hands and feet to the Java runtime-libraries right? Same also with C#, you expect C# to be purely limited to the dot-net framework. And if you like me dabbed in Oxygene back in 2005-2006, you probably think Oxygene is purely a dot-net adapted version of Object Pascal right? But RemObjects have turned that on it’s head!

Remember the decoupling I mentioned at the beginning of this post? What that means in practical terms is that they have separated each language into three distinct parts:

1. The syntax
2. The RTL
3. The target

What this means, is that you can pick your own combinations!

Let’s say you are coming from Delphi. You have 20 years of Object Pascal experience under your belt, and while you dont mind learning new things – Object Pascal is where you will be most productive.

Well in that case picking Oxygene Pascal covers the syntax part. But you don’t have to use the dot-net framework if you don’t want to. You can mix and match these 3 parts as you see fit! Let’s look at some combinations you could pick:

• Oxygene Pascal -> dot net framework -> CIL
• Oxygene Pascal -> “VCL” -> CIL
• Oxygene Pascal -> “VCL” -> WinAPI
• Oxygene Pascal -> “VCL” -> WebAssembly

(*) The “VCL” here is a compatibility RTL closely modeled on the Freepascal LCL and Delphi VCL. This is written from scratch and contains no proprietary code. It is purely to get people productive faster.

The whole point of this tripartite decoupling is to allow developers to maximize the value of their existing skill-set. If you know Object Pascal then that is a natural starting point for you. If you know the VCL then obviously the VCL compatibility RTL is going to help you become productive much faster than calling WinAPI on C level. But you can, if you like, go all native. And you can likewise ignore native and opt for WebAssembly.

Sound cool? Indeed it is! But it gets better, let’s look at some of the targets:

• Microsoft Windows
• Apple OS X
• Apple iOS
• Apple WatchOS
• Android
• Android wearables
• Linux x86 / 64
• Linux ARM
• tvOS
• WebAssembly
• * dot-net
• * Java

In short: Pick the language you want, pick the RTL or framework you want, pick the target you want — and start coding!

(*) dot-net and Java are not just frameworks, they are also targets since they are Virtual Machines. WebAssembly also fall under the VM category, although the virtual machine there is bolted into Chrome and Firefox (also node.js).

Some example code

Webassembly is something that interest me more than native these days. Sure I love the speed that native has to offer, but since Javascript has become “the defacto universal platform”, and since most of my work privately is done in Javascript – it seems like the obvious place to start.

Webassembly is a bit like Javascript was 10 years ago. I remember it was a bit of a shock coming from Delphi. We had just created Smart Mobile Studio, and suddenly we realized that the classes and object the browser had to offer were close to barren. We were used to the VCL after all. So my work there was basically to implement something with enough similarity to the VCL to be familiar to to Delphi developer, without wandering too far away from established JS standards.

Webassembly is roughly in the same ballpark. Webassembly is just a runtime engine. It doesn’t give you all those nice and helpful classes out of the box. You are expected to either write that yourself – or (as luck would have it) rely on what language vendors provide.

RemObjects have a lot to offer here, because their “Delphi VCL” compatibility RTL compiles just fine for Webassembly. There is no form designer though, but I haven’t used a form designer in years. I prefer to do everything in code because that’s ultimately what works when your codebase grows large enough anyways. Even my Delphi projects are done mainly as raw code, because I like to have the option to compile with Freepascal and Lazarus.

My first test code for Oxygene Pascal with Webassembly as the target is thus very bare-bone. If there is something that has bugged me to no end, it’s that bloody HTML5 canvas. It’s a powerful thing, but it’s also overkill for per-pixel operations. So I figured that a nice, ad-hoc DIB (device independent bitmap) class will do wonders.

Note: Oxygene supports pointers, even under WebAssembly (!), but out of old habit I have avoided it. I want my code to compile for all the targets, without marking a class as “unsafe” in the dot-net paradigm. So I have avoided pointers and just use offsets instead.

namespace qtxlib;

interface

type

  // in-memory pixel format
  TPixelFormat = public (
      pf8bit  = 0,  //___8 -- palette indexed
      pf15bit = 1,  //_555 -- 15 bit encoded
      pf16bit = 2,  //_565 -- 16 bit encoded
      pf24bit = 3,  //_888 -- 24 bit native
      pf32bit = 4   //888A -- 32 bit native
      );

  TPixelBuffer = public class
  private
    FPixels:  array of Byte;
    FDepthLUT: array of Integer;
    FScanLUT: array of Integer;
    FStride:  Integer;
    FWidth:   Integer;
    FHeight:  Integer;
    FBytes:   Integer;
    FFormat:  TPixelFormat;
  protected
    function  CalcStride(const Value, PixelByteSize, AlignSize: Integer): Integer;
    function  GetEmpty: Boolean;
  public
    property  Width: Integer read FWidth;
    property  Height: Integer read FHeight;
    property  Stride: Integer read FStride;
    property  &Empty: Boolean read GetEmpty;
    property  BufferSize: Integer read FBytes;
    property  PixelFormat: TPixelFormat read FFormat;
    property  Buffer[const index: Integer]: Byte read (FPixels[&index]) write (FPixels[&index]);

    function  OffsetForPixel(const dx, dy: Integer): Integer;
    procedure Alloc(NewWidth, NewHeight: Integer; const PxFormat: TPixelFormat);
    procedure Release();

    function Read(Offset: Integer; ByteLength: Integer): array of Byte;
    procedure Write(Offset: Integer; const Data: array of Byte);

    constructor Create; virtual;

    finalizer;
    begin
      if not GetEmpty() then
        Release();
    end;
end;

TColorMixer = public class
end;

TPainter = public class
private
  FBuffer:    TPixelBuffer;
public
  property    PixelBuffer: TPixelBuffer read FBuffer;

  constructor Create(const PxBuffer: TPixelBuffer); virtual;
end;

implementation

//##################################################################################
// TPainter
//##################################################################################

constructor TPainter.Create(const PxBuffer: TPixelBuffer);
begin
  inherited Create();
  if PxBuffer  nil then
    FBuffer := PxBuffer
  else
    raise new Exception("Pixelbuffer cannot be NIL error");
end;

//##################################################################################
// TPixelBuffer
//##################################################################################

constructor TPixelBuffer.Create;
begin
  inherited Create();
  FDepthLUT := [1, 2, 2, 3, 4];
end;

function TPixelBuffer.GetEmpty: Boolean;
begin
  result := length(FPixels) = 0;
end;

function TPixelBuffer.OffsetForPixel(const dx, dy: integer): Integer;
begin
  if length(FPixels) > 0 then
  begin
    result := dy * FStride;
    inc(result, dx * FDepthLUT[FFormat]);
  end;
end;

procedure TPixelBuffer.Write(Offset: Integer; const Data: array of Byte);
begin
  for each el in Data do
  begin
    FPixels[Offset] := el;
    inc(Offset);
  end;
end;

function TPixelBuffer.Read(Offset: Integer; ByteLength: Integer): array of Byte;
begin
  result := new Byte[ByteLength];
  var xOff := 0;
  while ByteLength > 0 do
  begin
    result[xOff] := FPixels[Offset];
    dec(ByteLength);
    inc(Offset);
    inc(xOff);
  end;
end;

procedure TPixelBuffer.Alloc(NewWidth, NewHeight: Integer; const PxFormat: TPixelFormat);
begin
  if not GetEmpty() then
    Release();

  if NewWidth < 1 then
    raise new Exception("Invalid width error");

  if NewHeight  0 then
    result := ( (Result + AlignSize) - xFetch );
end;

end.

This code is just meant to give you a feel for the dialect. I have used a lot of “Delphi style” coding here, so chances are you will hardly see any difference bar namespaces and a funny looking property declaration.

Stay tuned for more posts as I explore the different aspects of Oxygene and webassembly in the days to come 🙂

RemObjects Remoting SDK?

Reading this you could be forgiven for thinking that I must promote RemObjects products, It’s my job now right? Well yes, but also no.

The thing is, I’m really not “traveling salesman” material by any stretch of the imagination. My tolerance for bullshit is ridiculously low, and being practical of nature I loath fancy products that cost a fortune yet deliver nothing but superficial fluff.

The reasons I went to work at RemObjects are many, but most of all it’s because I have been an avid supporter of their products since they launched. I have used and seen their products in action under intense pressure, and I have come to put some faith in their solutions.

Trying to describe what it’s like to write servers that should handle thousands of active user “with or without” RemObjects Remoting SDK is exhausting, because you end up sounding like a fanatic. Having said that, I feel comfortable talking about the products because I speak from experience.

I will try to outline some of the benefits here, but you really should check it out yourself. You can download a trial directly here: https://www.remotingsdk.com/ro/

Remoting framework, what’s that?

RemObjects Remoting framework (or “RemObjects SDK” as it was called earlier) is a framework for writing large-scale RPC (remote procedure call) servers and services. Unlike the typical solutions available for Delphi and C++ builder, including those from Embarcadero I might add, RemObjects framework stands out because it distinguishes between transport, host and message-format – and above all, it’s sheer quality and ease of use.

RemObjects Remoting SDK ships with a rich selection of channels and message formats

This separation between transport, host and message-format makes a lot of sense, because the parameters and data involved in calling a server-method, shouldn’t really be affected by how it got there.

And this is where the fun begins because the framework offers you a great deal of different server types (channels) and you can put together some interesting combinations by just dragging and dropping components.

How about JSON over email? Or XML over pipes?

The whole idea here is that you don’t have to just work with one standard (and pay through the nose for the privilege). You can mix and match from a rich palette of transport mediums and message-formats and instead focus on your job; to deliver a kick-ass product.

And should you need something special that isn’t covered by the existing components, inheriting out your own channel or message classes is likewise a breeze. For example, Andre Mussche have some additional components on GitHub that adds a WebSocket server and client. So there is a lot of room for expanding and building on the foundation provided by RemObjects.

And this is where RemObjects has the biggest edge (imho), namely that their solutions shaves weeks if not months off your development time. And the central aspect of that is their integrated service designer.

Integration into the Delphi IDE

Dropping components on a form is all good and well, but the moment you start coding services that deploy complex data-types (records or structures) the amount of boilerplate code can become overwhelming.

The whole point of a remoting framework is that it should expose your services to the world. Someone working in .net or Java on the other side of the planet should be able to connect, consume and invoke your services. And for that to happen every minute detail of your service has to follow standards.

The RemObjects Service Builder integrates directly into the Delphi IDE

When you install RemObjects SDK, it also integrates into the Delphi IDE. And one of the features it integrates is a complete, separate service designer. The designer can also be used outside of the Delphi IDE, but I cannot underline enough how handy it is to be able to design your services visually, right there and then, in the Delphi IDE.

This designer doesn’t just help you design your service description (RemObjects has their own RODL file-format, which is a bit like a Microsoft WSDL file), the core purpose is to auto-generate all the boilerplate code for you — directly into your Delphi project (!)

So instead of you having to spend a week typing boilerplate code for your killer solution, you get to focus on implementing the actual methods (which is what you are supposed to be doing in the first place).

DLL services, code re-use and multi-tenancy

The idea of multi-tenancy is an interesting one. One that I talked about with regards to Rad-Server both in Oslo and London before christmas. But Rad-Server is not the only system that allows for multi-tenancy. I was doing multi-tenancy with RemObjects SDK some 14 years ago (if not earlier).

Remember how I said the framework distinguishes between transport, message and host? That last bit, namely host, is going to change how you write applications.

When you install the framework, it registers a series of custom project types inside the Delphi IDE. So if you want to create a brand new RemObjects SDK server project, you can just do that via the ordinary File->New->Other menu option.

One of the project types is called a DLL Server. Which literally means you get to isolate a whole service library inside a single DLL file! You can then load in this DLL file and call the functions from other projects. And that is, ultimately, the fundamental principle for multi-tenancy.

And no, you don’t have to compile your project with external packages for this to work. The term “dll-server” can also be a bit confusing, because we are not compiling a network server into a DLL file, we are placing the code for a service into a DLL file. I used this project type to isolate common code, so I wouldn’t have to copy unit-files all over the place when delivering the same functionality.

It’s also a great way to save money. Don’t want to pay for that new upgrade? Happy with the database components you have? Isolate them in a DLL-Server and continue to use the code from your new Delphi edition. I have Delphi XE3 Database components running inside a RemObjects DLL-Server that I use from Delphi XE 10.3.

DLL server is awesome and elegantly solves real-life problems out of the box

In my example I was doing business-logic for our biggest customers. Each of them used the same database, but they way they registered data was different. The company I worked for had bought up these projects (and thus their customers with them), and in order to keep the customers happy we couldn’t force them to re-code their systems to match ours. So we had to come up with a way to upgrade our technology without forcing a change on them.

The first thing I did was to create a “DLL server” that dealt with the database. It exposed methods like openTable(), createInvoice(), getInvoiceById() and so on. All the functions I would need to work with the data without getting my fingers dirty with SQL outside the DLL. So all the nitty gritty of SQL components, queries and whatnot was neatly isolated in that DLL file.

I then created separate DLL-Server projects for each customer, implemented their service interfaces identical to their older API. These DLL’s directly referenced the database library for authentication and doing the actual work.

When integrated with the IDE, you are greeted with a nice welcome window when you start Delphi. Here you can open examples or check out the documentation

Finally, I wrapped it all up in a traditional Windows system service, which contained two different server-channels and the message formats they needed. When the service was started it would simply load in the DLL’s and manually register their services and types with the central channel — and voila, it worked like a charm!

Rock solid

Some 10 years after I delivered the RemObjects based solution outlined above, I got a call from my old employer. They had been victim of a devastating cyber attack. I got a bit anxious as he went on and on about damages and costs, fearing that I had somehow contributed to the situation.

But it turned out he called to congratulate me! Out of all the services in their server-park, mine were the only ones left standing when the dust settled.

The RemObjects payload balancer had correctly dealt with both DDOS and brute force attacks, and the hackers were left wanting at the gates.

LDef and bytecodes

LDef, short for Language Definition format, is a standard I have been formulating for a couple of years. I have taken my experience with writing various compilers and parsers, and also my experience of writing RTL’s and combined it all into a standard.

LDef is a way for anyone to create their own programming language. Just like popular libraries and packages deals with the low-level stuff, like Gr32 which is an excellent graphics library — LDef deals with the hard stuff and leaves you with the pleasant job of defining what the language should look like.

The idea is to make a language construction kit if you like, where the underlying engine is flexible enough to express the languages we know and love today – and also powerful enough to express new ideas. For example: let’s say you want to create an awesome new game system (just as an example, it applies to any system that can be automated). You have the means and skill to create the actual engine – but how are you going to market it? You will be up against monoliths like Unity and simple “click and play” engines like ClickTeam Fusion, Game Maker and the likes.

Well, the only way to make good games is hard work. There is no two ways about it. You can fake your way only so far – so at the end of the day you want to give your users something solid.

In our example of publishing a game-engine, I think that you would stand a much better chance of attracting users if you hooked that engine up to a language. A language that is easy to use, easy to learn and with commands that are both specific and non-specific to your engine.

There are some flavours of Basic that has produced knock-out games for decades, like BlitzBasic. That language alone has produced hundreds of titles for both PC, XBox and even Nintendo. So it’s insanely fast and not a pushover.

And here is the cool part about LDEF: namely that it makes it easy for you to design your own languages. You can use one of the pre-defined languages, like object pascal or visual basic if that is what you like – but ultimately the fun begins when you start to experiment with new ideas and language features. And it’s fun when you get to that point, because all the nitty gritty is handled. You get to focus on the superficial stuff like syntax and high level functions. So you can shave off quite a bit of development time and make coding fun again!

The paradox of faster bytecodes

Bytecodes used to be to slow for anything substantial. On 16-bit machines bytecodes were used in maybe one language (that I know of) and that was the ‘E’ compiler. The E language was maybe 30 years ahead of its time and is probably the only language I can think of that fits cloud programming like hand in glove. But it was also an excellent system automation language (scripting) and really turned some heads back in the late 80s and early 90s. REXX was only recently added to OS X, some 28 years after the Amiga line of computers introduced it to the general public.

Bytecode dump of a program compiled with the node.js version of the compiler

In modern times bytecodes have resurfaced through Java and the .NET framework which for some reason caused a stir in the whole development community. I honestly never bought into the hype, but I am old enough to remember the whole story – so I’m probably not the Microsoft demographic anyways. Java hyped their virtual machine opcodes to the point of exhaustion. People really are stupid. Man did they do a number on CEO’s and heads of R&D around the world.

Anyways, end of the story was that Intel and AMD went with it and did some optimizations that could help bytecodes run faster. The stack was optimized with Java, because let’s face it – it is the proverbial assault on the hardware. And the cache was expanded on command from the emper.. eh, Microsoft. Also (if I remember correctly) the “jump to pointer” and various branch instructions were made to execute faster. I remember reading about this in Dr. Dobbs Journal and Microsoft Developer Magazine; granted it was a few years ago. What was interesting is the symbiotic relationship that exists between Intel and Microsoft, I really didn’t know just how closely knit these guys were.

Either way, bytecodes in 2017 is capable of a lot more than they ever were on 16-bit and early 32-bit systems. A cpu like Intel i5 or i7 will chew through bytecodes like a warm knife on butter. It depends on how you orchestrate the opcodes and how much work you delegate to the various instructions.

Modeled instructions

Bytecodes are cool but they have to be modeled right, or its all going to end up as a bloated, slow and limited system. You don’t want to be to low-level, otherwise what is the point of bytecodes? Bytecodes should be a part of a bigger picture, one that could some day be modeled using FPGA’s for instance.

The LDef format is very flexible. Each instruction is ultimately a single 32-bit longword (4 bytes) where each byte holds key information about the command, what data is forward in the cache and how it should be read.

The byte organization is:

• 0 – Actual opcode
• 1 – Instruction layout

Depending on the instruction layout, the next two bytes can hold different values. The instruction layout is a simple value that defines how the data for the instruction is passed.

• Constant to register
• Variable to register
• Register to register
• Register to variable
• Register to stack
• Stack to register
• Variable to variable
• Constant to variable
• Stack to variable
• Program counter (PC) to register
• Register to Program counter
• ED (exception data) to register
• Register to exception-data

As you can probably work out from the information here, this list hints to some archetectual features. Variables are first class citizens in LDef, they are allocated, managed and released using instructions. Constants can be either automatically handled and references by id (a resource chunk is linked to the class binary) or “in place” and compiled directly into the assembly as part of the instruction. For example

load R[0], "this is a test"

This line of code will take the constant “this is a test” and move it into register #0. You can choose to have the text-data stored as a proper resource which is appended to the compiled bytecode (all classes and modules have a resource chunk) or just compile “as is” and have the data read directly. The first option is faster and something you can adjust with compiler optimization options. The second option is easier to work with when you debug since you can see the data directly as a part of the debug memory dump.

And last but not least there are registers. 32 of them in number (so for the low-level coders out there you should have few limitations with regards to register mapping). All operations (like divide, multiply etc) operate on registers only. So to multiply two variables they first have to be moved into registers and the multiplication is executed there – then you can move the result to a variable afterwards.

LDef assembly code. Simple but extremely effective

The reason registers is used in my runtime system – is because you will not be able to model a FPGA with high-level concepts like “variables” should someone every try to implement this as hardware. Things like registers however is very easy to model and how actual processors work. You move things from memory into a cpu register, perform an action, and then move the result back into memory.

This is where Java made a terrible mistake. They move all data onto the stack and then call the operation. This simplifies execution of instructions since there is never any registers to keep track of, but it just murders stack-space and renders Java useless on mobile devices. The reason Google threw out classical Java (e.g Java as bytecodes) is due to this fact (and more). After the first android devices came out they quickly switched to a native compiler – because Java was too slow, to power-hungry and required too much memory (especially stack space) to function properly. Battery life was close to useless and the only way to save Java was to go native. Which is laughable because the entire point of Java was mobility, “compile once run everywhere” — yeah well, that didn’t turn out to well did it 😀

Dot net improved on this by adding a “load resource” type instruction, where each method will load in the constant data by number – and they are loaded into pre-defined slots (the variables you have used naturally). Then you can execute operations in typical “A + B to C” style (actually all of that is omitted since the compiler already knows both A, B and C). This is much more stack friendly and places performance penalty on the common language runtime (CLR).

Sadly Microsoft’s platform, like everything Microsoft does, requires a pretty large infrastructure. It’s not simple, elegant and fast – it’s more monolithic, massive and resource hungry. You don’t see .net being the first thing ported to a new platform. You typically see GCC followed by Freepascal.

LDef takes the bytecode architecture one step further. On assembly level you reference data using identifiers just like .net, and each instruction is naturally executed by the runtime-engine – but data handling is kept within the virtual realm. You are expected to use the registers as temporary holding slots for your information. And no operations are ever done directly on a variable.

The benefit of this is:

• Better payload balancing
• Easier to JIT since the architecture is closer to real assembly
• Retains important aspects of how real hardware works (with FPGA in mind)

So there are good reasons for the standard, all of them very good.

C like intermediate language

With assembler so clearly defined you would expect  assembly to be the way you work. In essence that what you do, but since OOP is built into the system and there are structures you are expected to populate — structures that would be tedious to do in raw unbridled assembler, I have opted for a C++ inspired intermediate language.

The LDEF assembler kitchen sink

You would half expect me to implement pascal, but truth be told pascal parsing is more complex than C parsing, and C allows you to recycle parsers more easily, so dealing with sub structures and nested regions is less maintainance and easier to write code for.

So there is no spesific reason why I picked C++ as a intermediate language. I would prefer pascal but I also think it would cause a lot of confusion since object pascal will be the prime citizen of LDef languages. My other language, N++ also used curley brackets so I’m honestly not strict about what syntax people prefer.

Intermediate language features supported are:

• Class declarations
• Struct declarations
• Parameter to register mapping
• Before mehod code (enter)
• After method code (leave)
• Alloc section for class fields
• Alloc section for method variables

The before and after code for methods is very handy. They allow you to define code that should execute before the actual procedure. On a higher level when designing a new language, this is where you would implement custom allocation, parameter testing etc.

So if you call this method:

function testcode() {
    enter {
      writeln("this is called before the method entry");
    }
    leave { 
      writeln("this is called after the method exits");
    }
  writeln("this is the method body");
}

Results in the following output:

this is called before the method entry
this is the method body
this is called after the method exits

 

When you work with designing your language, you eventually.

Truly portable

Now I have no aspirations in going into competition with neither Oracle, Microsoft or anyone in between. Like most geeks I do things I find interesting and enjoy working within a field of computing that is stimulating and personally rewarding.

Programming languages is an area where things havent really changed that much since the golden 80s. Sure we have gotten a ton of fancy new software, and the way people use languages has changed – but at the end of the day the languages we use havent really changed that much.

JavaScript is probably the only language that came out of the blue and took the world by storm, but that is due to the central role the browser holds for the internet. I sincerely doubt JavaScript would even have made a dent in the market otherwise.

LDef is the type of toolkit that can change all this. It’s not just another language, and it’s not just another bytecode engine. A lot of thought has gone into its architecture, not just notions of “how can we do this or that”, but big ideas about the future of computing and how IOT will sculpt the market within 5-8 years. And the changes will be permanent and irrevocable.

Being able to define new languages will be utmost important in the decade ahead. We don’t even know the landscape yet but we can extrapolate some ideas based on where technology is going. All of it in broad strokes of course, but still – there are some fundamental facts about computers that the timeless and havent aged a day. It’s like mathematics, the Pythagorean theorem may be 2500 years old but it’s just as valid today as it was back then. Principles never die.

I took the example of a game engine at the start of this article. That might have been a poor choice for some, but hopefully the general reader got the message: the nature of control requires articulation. Regardless if you are coding an invoice system or a game engine, factors like time, portability and ease of use will be just as valid.

There is also automation to keep your eye on. While most of it is just media hype at this point, there will be some form of AI automation. The media always exaggerates things, so I think we can safely disregard a walking, self-aware Terminator type robot replacing you at work. In my view you can disregard as much as 80% of what the media talks about (regardless of topic). But some industries will see wast improvement from automation. The oil and gas sector are the most obvious. A the moment security is as good as humans can make them – which means it is flawed and something goes wrong every day around the globe. But smart pumping stations and clever pressure measurements and handling will make a huge difference for the people who work with oil. And safer oil pipelines means lives saved and better environmental control.

The question is, how do we describe programs 20 years from now? Is our current tools up for the reality of IOT and billions of connected devices? Do we even have a language that runs equally well as a 1000 instance server-cluster as it would as a stand alone program on your desktop? When you start to look into parallel computing and multi-cluster data processing farms – languages like C# and C++ makes little sense. Node.js is close, very close, but dealing with all the callbacks and odd limitations of JavaScript is tedious (which is why we created Smart Pascal to begin with).

The future needs new things. And for that to happen we first need tools to create them. Which is where my passion is.

Node, native and beyond

When people create compilers and programming languages they often do so for a reason. It could be that their own tools are lacking (which was my initial motivation), or that they have thought of a better way to achieve something; the reasons can be many. In Microsofts case it was revenge and spite, since they were unsuccessful in stealing Java away from Sun Microsystems (Oracle now owns Java).

LDef binaries are fairly straight forward. The less fluff the better

Point is, you implement your idea using the language you know – on the platform you normally use. So for me that is object pascal on windows. I’m writing object pascal because while the native compiler and runtime is written in Delphi – it is made to compile under Freepascal for Linux and OS X.

But the primary work is done in Smart Pascal and compiled to JavaScript for node.js. So the native part is actually a back-port from Smart. And there is a good reason I’m doing it this way.

First of all I wanted a runtime and compiler system that would require very little to run. Node.js has grown fat in features over the past couple of years – but out of the box node.js is fast, portable and available almost anywhere these days. You can write some damn fast and scalable cloud servers with node (and with fast i mean FAST, as in handling thousands of online gamers all playing complex first person worlds) and you can also write some stable and rock solid system services.

Node is turning into a jack of all trades, capable of scaling and clustering way beyond what native software can do. Netflix actually re-wrote their entire service stack using node back in 2014. The old C++ and ASP approach was not able to handle the payload. And every time they did a small change it took 45 minutes to compile and get a binary to test. So yeah, node.js makes so much more sense when you start looking a big-data!

So I wanted to write LDef in a way that made it portable and easy to implement. Regardless of platform, language and features. Out of the box JavaScript is pretty naked stuff and the most advanced high-level feature LDef uses is buffers to deal with memory. everything else is forced to be simple and straight forward. No huge architecture or global system services, just a small and fast runtime and your binaries. And that’s all you need to run your compiled applications.

Ultimately, LDef will be written in LDef itself and compile itself. Needing only a small executable stub to be ported to a new platform. Most of mono C# for Linux is written in C# itself – again making it super easy to move mono between distros and operating systems. You can’t do that with the Visual Studio, at least not until Microsoft wants you to. Neither would you expect that from Apple XCode. Just saying.

The only way to achieve the same portability that mono, freepascal and C/C++ has to offer, is naturally to design the system as such from the beginning. Keep it simple, avoid (operatingsystem) globalization at all cost, and never-ever use platform bound APIs except in the runtime. Be Posix but for everything!

Current state of standard and licensing

The standard is currently being documented and a lot of work has been done in this department already. But it’s a huge project to document since it covers not only LDEF as a high-level toolkit, but stretches from the compiler to the source-code it is designed to compile to the very binary output. The standard documentation is close to a book at this stage, but that’s the way it has to be to ensure every part is understood correctly.

But the question most people have is often “how are you licensing this?”.

Well, I really want LDEF to be a free standard. However, to protect it against hijacking and abuse – a license must be obtained for financial entities (as in companies) using the LDEF toolkit and standard in commercial products.

I think the way Unreal software handles their open-source business is a great example of how things should be done. They never charge the little guy or the Indie developer – until they are successful enough to afford it. So once sales hits a defined sum, you are expected to pay a small percentage in royalties. Which is only fair since Unreal engine is central to the software to begin with.

So LDef is open source, free to use for all types of projects (with an obligation to pay a 3% royalty for commercial products that exceeds $4999 in revenue). Emphasis is on open source development. As long as the financial obligations by companies and developers using LDEF to create successful products is respected, only creativity sets the limit.

If you use LDEF to create a successful product where you make 50.000 NKR (roughly USD 5000) you are legally bound to pay 3% of your product revenue monthly for the duration of the product. Which is extremely little (3% of $5000 is $150 which is a lot less than you would pay for a Delphi license, the latter costing between upwards of USD 3000).

 

Delphi developer on its own server

While the Facebook group will naturally continue exactly like it has these past years, we have set up a server active Delphi developers on my Quartex server.

This has a huge benefit: first of all those that want to test the Smart Desktop can do so from the same domain – and people who want to test Smart Mobile Studio can do so with myself just a PM away. Error reports etc. will still need to be sent to the standard e-mail, but now I can take a more active role in supervising the process and help clear up whatever missunderstanding could occur.

Always good with a hardcore Smart, Laz, amibian.js forum!

Besides that we are building a lively community of Delphi, Lazarus, Smart and Oxygene/Remobjects developers! Need a job? Have work you need done? Post an add — wont cost you a penny.

So why not sign up? Its free, it wont bite you and we can continue regardless of Facebook’s up-time this year..

You enter here and just fill out user/pass and that’s it: http://quartexhq.myasustor.com/sharetronix/

Why C# coders should shut up about Delphi

EDIT: Some 3 years after this satire post was published, a website called “.NetRocks” decided to make a number out of it. The satire clearly went over their heads, and the facts I outline in the post was met with ridicule. I’m a bit disappointed with .NetRocks, because this could have been a great opportunity for them to learn more about modern object-pascal development and it’s ecosystems. They seem genuinely baffled that Delphi and Object-Pascal in general was being used in 2016 (and 2019), and their behavior and response demonstrates the very arrogance and ignorance we have come to expect from “brogrammers” of their type.

I must admit that I’m somewhat shocked that a massive show like .NetRocks is utterly ignorant of the fact that Object-Pascal as a language has millions of users around the world. You have compilers like Oxygene from RemObjects that targets .Net, Java, x86, ARM and WebAssembly. So their whole podcast on “how to port Delphi applications to C#” is absurd, because that’s not how you migrate code from Delphi to .Net. The Elements ecosystem, which covers C#, Pascal, Java, Swift and GoLang installs straight into Visual Studio and adds Object-Pascal to the environment. You can also convert source-code between Pascal and C# through automation. Manually going about such tasks is amateurish to say the least, but I honestly didn’t expect much when they open their podcast with verbal abuse.

While .NetRocks is manually porting pascal to C#, the rest of us use the Elements compiler and just compile the code to .Net Assemblies. You can also convert the code to any of the 5 languages Elements support. I have to wonder what rock .NetRocks lives under to be oblivious to this

Another point .NetRocks seem to have missed, is that Delphi has been aggressively optimized since Embarcadero took over from Borland. In 2016 Object Pascal ranked as #14 [2.164 score] on the Tiobi index over most popular programming languages [globally], just nine points below C#. So the most cost effective way of getting your legacy Delphi application modernized, is to just buy Elements from RemObjects, or upgrade your Delphi version to this century.

If they had bothered to check they would also have learned that I manage some 16+ developer groups on social media, with roughly 50.000 developers in total. I have also worked for Embarcadero that makes Delphi, so my statements while whimsical and satirical, were based on facts. I work with Fortune 500 companies in the US, as well as large companies around Europe, that all rely on Object-Pascal for their daily operations. Heck, even the Walt Disney company wanted to get rid of .Net in favour of Object Pascal in 2018. Turns out JIT is a disaster when coding against hardware interrupts and “old school” automation. Who could have guessed? (that was satire btw).

Some people seem to think that Delphi ended with version 7 back in  the 90s. Delphi has been under heavy development since Embarcadero took over for Borland. .NetRocks doesnt even mention that buying a modern version of Delphi is an option companies should consider. And if they absolutely have to migrate to C#, then Elements is what professionals use.

On the whole, It’s alarming that the guys at .NetRocks seem clueless to the tools professional developers use for specialized work. Porting a Delphi codebase by hand its, well, amateurish at best. They might as well do a podcast on how to use ms-paint to create art, because Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator is not what people use (that was satire btw).

I am also pleased however, because .NetRocks unwittingly demonstrated my point to perfection 🙂 Instead of learning more about Anders Hejlsberg’s journey and life before he joined Microsoft, how the .Net class hierarchy is heavily influenced by the Delphi VCL framework, or how the concepts that ended up as .Net were in fact prototyped and experimented with earlier — they jumped straight to ridicule. Of a satire post (lol!).

You can click here for my full reply. And seriously, how it’s possible to mistake this old post as anything but heavy satire is beyond me. But I am thankful to .NetRocks for demonstrating my point. I could not have asked for a better example of arrogance and ignorance 🙂 Rock on!

---

 

When in Rome

Those that follow my blog or know me personally – also know that I don’t go out of my way to be confrontational or disrespectful. I try my best to follow the middle-path, to see positive in all things. But sometimes you face a level of stupid that begs a response. A verbal one. And this is one of those cases.

Lately I see more and more Delphi developers getting into debates with C# developers, and they are confronted with an attitude and belief-system that quite frankly is utter nonsense. It’s not based on history or facts but disputes rooted in childish “isms”. A mix of old habits and an unhealthy obsession with the notion that new means better.

It is nothing short of an intellectual emergency.

Old is bad?

If that is the case then C/C++ should be utter shit, because C is 3 years older than Pascal. Pascal was created to replace C and get away from (amongst other things) the absurd and time-consuming header file practice, not to mention the recursive hell that still occur when headers reference other headers and conditional symbols pile up.

Do you know how curly brackets became popular? Jump into your nearest Tardis and set the destination to the mid 1960’s. Back when mainframes were the size of Portugal and 1024 bytes of memory was the bomb. You see, back then memory was sparse and pretty much all the languages (or toolkits) needed to save space. So the { } curly’s were used as tokens for words like “begin” and “end”. Why? Because one ascii byte is less than five ascii bytes. Every byte counts when you only have a few Kb of memory.

Ps: when I use the word toolkit here I really mean a random soup of asm snippets on a loom. The bones collected to make C was actually a mix of homebrew toolkits made by different engineering teams at the time. And each of these toolkits had their own fanclub /slash/ legal representation; because all of them, miraculously, had invented the exact same thing at the same time before everyone else. These guys kept on fighting over who owned what well into the Watcom era. It’s probably the longest standing demonstration of a grown-up tantrum since the roman emperor caligula outlawed clothing.

Fast forward to 1970 and the amount of memory on mainframes had already doubled a few times just like Moore had predicted five years earlier. The C standard that Dennis Ritchie had painstakingly wrangled from the cold, greedy hands of grumpy old technicians was due for an upgrade. Tests were done by very dull, very serious men in grey clothing – and in their horror they discovered that human beings would interact with words and phrases faster than symbols and glyphs. So a word like “begin” would be picked up by the brain faster than {. It is just knockout stuff isn’t it.

You cannot praise Anders as a genius architect and at the same time throw his life work in the thrash. Perhaps you should ask yourself why Anders loved object pascal so much that he dedicated half his career making sure universities had access to it.

Living on the edge, Nicolaus Wirth rocks the scene!

Enter Niklaus Wirth, a man so clever and academic that he doesn’t catch exceptions; He is the exception. But next to his colleagues over at Berkley our dear Niklaus is the proverbial rock-star. He decided that in order to make programming more accessible for students, easier to learn and above all, establishing a standard for safer code, that they should take science to heart and include that in a programming language design. So he put on his gravest lab coat and began to implement “a better C” where he applied the research that words are picked up by the brain faster than tokens and symbols. Nine months later pascal was born, and to celebrate Niklaus used colored socks that day. A risky bit of business that could have cost him his seat at the strangely brown sorority club, in which he was master of ceremonies. But hey, Nikolaus is a rebel and this was the swinging 70’s after all.

My point? This is why pascal uses “begin” and “end” as opposed to { and }. It’s one of the many aspects of the Pascal language that makes it so easy to master.

Whimsical satire aside: with the knowledge that C is actually older than pascal, not to mention that it is identical in features, depth and complexity to Pascal– what is it going to be? Do you still cling to the notion that older have to be of less value than new? Or could it in fact be that you haven’t really looked closer at object pascal to begin with? Have you even installed a modern version of Delphi and given it a worthy test drive? Or do you just speak out based on what you like and know, as opposed to what you don’t know and haven’t even tried.

My 8-year-old daughter is like that. She makes up her mind about food before she has even tasted it. Surely a trained engineer can do better?

And I say that because — if we follow your line of reasoning, C/C++ should be incapable of producing C#. How can something old and outdated possibly produce something new and exciting? You do know that C# is written in C and assembler right? And that Java and all the other high level languages out there didn’t spontaneously self assemble. They are all written in C, assembler or pascal. And there is a reason for that.

Just like nature have different levels, from particles to minerals, from minerals to bacteria, from bacteria to plants, from plants to insects (and so on) — so does a computer. Each of these levels have laws and principles that govern them, and no matter how much you want to introduce something from a higher level into a lower level – that’s just not how reality works.

The fact that I have to explain this in 2016 demonstrates how education and academia has degraded after C and Pascal was replaced with Java.

The law is very simple: each level can only emit complexity upwards. So assembler is used to produce C and pascal, C and pascal is used to produce C++ and object pascal, C++ and object pascal is used to bring about every other single piece of tech you take for granted.

So when you criticize Delphi but use C#, you are just underlying that you dont really understand the difference between archetypical languages and context based languages.

It’s like saying Visual Basic 5 is cooler than assembler. You don’t debate with people like that, you just look at them with pity. I don’t know how many years a software engineering  degree is elsewhere, but if you just spent 3 years in college and 2 years at a university followed by one or two additional years getting your diploma – and this is the level of insight you graduate with then I pity you. And I pity your employer because sooner or later you will bring about the apocalypse.

If we apply rational logical thought to the proposition at hand, we cannot but conclude that the notion of “new is always better” is false. It is to mistake marketing for facts and capitalism for science. The fundamental principles of computing wont change because you favour a high-level programming language. The C/C++ embedded market wont magically roll over, because C# is a mitigated disaster on embedded devices. And I speak from experience, not preference.

Your teacher should have taught you this: “In a computer, like nature, the past is always alive“. Look closely at your brand new PC or Mac: Bios, Vesa screen modes, non linear memory, hardware interrupt vectors and a cpu that supports no less than 3 instruction sets. You have layer on layer of increasing complexity (a.k.a “the past is still there”). Why not call up Linus Torvalds and ask him why he’s not using C# in his line of work; or NVidia why their GPU pipeline only ships with C headers and not C# classes. I sure as hell wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of that call.

The only C# compiler worth using, is actually RemObjects C# (the Elements compiler). Because unlike mono or ms’s compilers, Elements builds proper binaries on the same level as C/C++ and Pascal. You can actually write kernel modules with Elements if you like, something you cant do with Mono or Visual Studio. Heck, .net services still require a service host on Windows.

C# is better than Delphi?

Anders Hejlsberg, the father of many languages

Actually, it’s not. What today is known as .net, from its CIL intermediate language right down to the global assembly cache is pretty much Delphi with a new syntax parser on top. Yes you read that correctly the entire .net product family is practically Delphi refactored. The whole bytecode regime was one of the last skunkwork projects Anders worked on, and was actually described on Borland’s news-servers years before it magically re-appeared as Microsoft’s flagship product.

Anders Hejlsberg created and prototyped these technologies (as did many other companies, since Java made bytecodes cool) while he was working at Borland. And indeed, the father of C# and entire dot net stack is none other than the father of Delphi.

At Borland (in the borland.language newsfeed I vividly remember) these technologies went mentioned under the codename “portable Delphi”. I followed the thread on the news servers for quite some time. It was no secret that Borland was tinkering away on the next big thing, and I believe it was ultimately Borland’s response to Java. Because at the time Java had eaten quite a chunk of Borlands educational seat licenses. And had Anders continued working for Borland, Delphi and C++ builder would perhaps be bytecode based today.

Factoid: The first project Anders was assigned to when he joined Microsoft, was J#. Microsoft’s attempt at hijacking the Java language. Microsoft lost the legal battle and was forced to pivot. The end result would be C#.

So when you, the C# fanboy, propose that Delphi is somehow inferior to dot net, or that object pascal is outdated and technically behind C# you quite frankly have no clue what you are talking about. Is it generics? We have that. Is a rich and powerful RTTI? Got that covered. Anonymous procedures? Its there too. In fact, the whole misunderstanding here stems from the fact that C# developers generally think “Delphi 7” is what Delphi is all about. Which is the same that saying that .Net  is what came out in version 1. Who the hell uses Delphi 7 in our day and age.

But just to make this crystal clear: Anders Hejlsberg is not just the father of C# and dot net: he is also the father of Delphi. And before that he gave birth to Turbo Pascal. In fact, Anders have 3 (if not four) Pascal development systems behind him before he came to Microsoft.

Borland, land of the free

Borland, the company Anders worked for, was put out to pasture by Microsoft. Bill Gates launched a financial onslaught that few companies on the planet could have endured. The reason was that Microsoft really had the worst developer tools on the market (Visual Basic and Visual C++), while Borland represented the very best. So for a long time Borland utterly demolished Microsoft when it came to software development.

When Borland later began to flirt with Linux (Delphi Kylix) it must have made the R&D department at Microsoft piss themselves. Delphi is responsible for thousands of desktop applications synonymous with Windows – and if Linux users got their hands on RAD tools like Delphi, with thousands of applications ready to be ported over? Do the math. You have to remember that this was before cloud computing. Microsoft didn’t have a fallback strategy and depended on desktop and server sales. Linux could do everything Windows could, but it lacked the desktop applications, the user friendliness and features Borland made simple.

Wishing for stuff doesn’t make it true, except in the movies

What Microsoft did was, basically, to buy out Anders (they also picked up a huge part of Borlands R&D department) from Borland and at the same time attack the company from every angle. Drowning them in bullshit lawsuits, patent claims and all the nasty, cowardly practices Microsoft was into back then (we all remember Netscape and how that went).

Bill Gates called Anders up personally and gave him “an offer I could not refuse“. Whatever that means.

So to put this myth to bed and be done with it: C# as a language and dot net as a technology did not originate with Microsoft. It has Borland written all over it and its architecture is intimately joined at the hip with Delphi and C++ builder. Companies like Microsoft dont innovate any more, they buy competence and re-brands it as their own.

Dot Net framework, you mean the VCL?

If that is not enough, take a long, hard look at how the .net framework is organized. Pay special attention to the features and methods of the base-classes and RTTI. What you are looking at is the VCL, the visual component library, Delphi and C++ builder’s run time library.

If you know Delphi and it’s RTL intimately as well as C#, you quickly recognize the architecture. The syntax might be different, but the organization and names are all too familiar.

There was never any secret where this came from, but it’s not advertised either so I don’t blame people for not recognizing it. But when people start to behave nasty over what should be either a passionate hobby or a professional discipline, then truth must be told. The very foundation of the dot net framework is taken straight out of the VCL.

And why shouldn’t it? The whole platform was whispered about under the codename “portable Delphi” to begin with, it was even designed by the same author – so why should it come as a surprise that it’s basically Delphi reincarnated with a different syntax parser? Either way a few bells should start ringing in your head – telling you that you may have been wrong about Delphi and object pascal in general. Probably because you know very little about Delphi to begin with.

So, what you perhaps believe sets C# apart from Delphi, what you imagine gives dot net an advantage over Delphi – is in reality the opposite: it is Delphi. It originated in Delphi, was inspired by Delphi and flows straight from the inventor of Delphi himself. Anders is responsible for two distinct object pascal development platforms prior to working for Microsoft. Take some time to reflect on that.

You cannot praise Anders as a genius architect and at the same time throw his life work in the thrash. Perhaps you should ask yourself why Anders loved object pascal so much that he dedicated half his career making sure universities had access to it.

Strength in diversity

The fact that C/C++ is alive and well today serves to prove my point: age has no meaning when dealing with fundamental technology. These languages embody the fundamental principles of computing. They don’t grow old because they represent a fundamental level that can never be replaced. There is now law that says C must be there, what persists is ultimately the features that C brings – spanning from assembly to the desktop. Those same features can be found only in one other language, namely Pascal.

Things are the way they are for a reason. And programmers before you established standards that address things you might not have to deal with, but that’s because they dealt with it before you. Just because you don’t see the plumbing doesn’t mean it’s not there.

These are the compilers responsible for the foundation on which all other languages, operating-systems, applications and services rest. Remove those, and the whole house of cards come crashing down.

So C/C++ and object pascal continue to exist, thrive even, precisely because they interface with the hardware itself, not a virtual machine or bytecode format. Delphi as a product is naturally tailored for operating-systems, as is C/C++. But that is because we use programming languages to create applications. There is nothing in the way of someone using compilers like freepascal and writing an operative system from scratch.

Ultibo is an ARM operative system written purely in object pascal

By contrast, C#, Java and Visual Basic are context dependent languages. They exist purely in context with an operative system or run-time environment. They can’t exist without these and lack the depth C and pascal brings to the table. The depth to span many levels, from the lowest all the way up to cloud and domain driven programming.

Just look at Android, an operative system written in Java right? Well that’s not really true. The Android operative system depends on a native bootstrap, a piece of code that establishes the run-time environment for Java applications. So when you fire up your Android phone, tablet or set-top box, the first thing to boot is a loading mechanism written in vanilla C. This in turn mounts a filesystem and continues to loads in bunch of native drivers. Drivers for the display, storage, wi-fi and all the hardware components that ultimately make up your SoC (system on a chip).

Its only after this long process that the environment is capable of hosting the Java virtual machine. Then and only then is the device capable of executing Java. This is why languages like Java is called context-based, because they run in context with an established system.

Notice the “C” part of the Java NDK? Wasnt that exactly what Java was supposed to solve? All that hype and here you are, back at where you started!

So Java, which for the past decade or more have bombarded us with advertising like “platform independence” is a total flop! Its like communism and looks good on paper, but once you start testing these ideas in real life – they just don’t work.

Turned out that the java virtual machine when running on small devices like phones and tablets, choked the CPU. Which in turn used more electricity to keep up, which in turn rendered the battery life of these devices null and void. Talk about irony. All that hype and Java couldn’t even deliver its most basic promise: platform independence. And you removed C and pascal from our universities for this? It’s a disaster en-par with the burning of the great library of Alexandria.

There is more than a drop of ego and arrogance in this material. Young people especially like to believe they are smarter than those who lived before them. It’s a very selfish idea that really need to be addressed. Take someone like Alan Turing for example, the inventor of what we call computers today. This man assembled and created the first computer by hand. He even hand carved the wheels that made the mechanism run (which was mechanical during the second world war). I would happily bet $1000 that Alan could out program the lot of us had he gotten the chance. He has been dead for many years, but to imagine yourself smarter or more capable than him would be the definition of arrogance.

PS: This is where we come into the realm of wisdom versus knowledge. The difference may be subtle, but it’s so important to distinguish between them.

C# would have been a sad little language without the work of this man, Miguel de icaza

Either way without the native context to support it Java turned out to be a blundering behemoth. And its the exact same with C#. This is why Miguel de Icaza work on Mono has been so instrumental to the success of dot net and C# in particular. It was Miguel and his team that pushed C# into native compilation versus JIT for mobile devices. C# would never have been allowed on IOS or Android otherwise.

So that is the difference between archetypical languages and context based languages. Hopefully you now see why this negative attitude towards Delphi and object pascal doesn’t make sense. It really is just as stupid as these cults that believe in dinosaurs and that human beings once lived side by side with a T-rex. Anyone with a highschool diploma should instinctively know better.

The problem is when people in great enough numbers start to believe in this nonsense, because then they can actually damage important mechanisms of our eco-system. Insane beliefs really is dangerous both socially and technically.

Grow up!

I have no problem using C# and consider it a valuable tool in my toolbox. Same with Delphi. But when it comes to kick-ass desktop applications for Windows and OS X, Delphi has no rival. It gives you a productive edge that I havent found in any other language. And I don’t base that on preference. I base that on engineering and the years of development invested in Delphi by both Borland and Embarcadero.

I just find it odd that C# developers seem to lack the ability to speak well about Delphi, because it’s a tell-tell sign of immaturity to be incapable of that. Object pascal and C++ is identical in every way (except multiple inheritance, which even C++ programmers shun like the plague so no loss there). Why then should educated programmers find it reasonable to praise C but thrash pascal? It’s like saying that one car is faster than another – but when you pop the hood they have the same engine. The exact same machine code generator even.  It is psychological masturbation. We are coders, we shouldnt do things like that. We should examine the system carefully and then make up our minds.

And what is a programming language anyway? It is the ability to describe the solution to a problem. The ability to define and control how a series of activities execute. Each language represents a methodology for solving problems. A mindset. Nothing more.

Languages like C, C++ and object pascal will always exist, they will always thrive, because they are instrumental to everything else (desktop, operative system, services, everything that makes a computer capable of what it does). It doesn’t mean that Delphi is the solution to all problems, far from it. And that is ok.

Context based languages are more often than not designed for a purpose. Java was initially designed as a network language. This makes Java infinitely more suitable for dealing with that line of work. You can do the exact same in C but you would have to add a few libraries and establish a platform. Which is exactly what C and pascal is good at, implementing fundamental technology. Object pascal is a language you would use when creating other languages. C is more popular for virtual machine development, no doubt there, but there is nothing in C/C++ that you wont find in object pascal.

Interestingly, languages that many believe is long since extinct, like Cobol, are actually alive. Cobol was created to deal with large stacks of numbers and to push associated data through formulas. That is its context and no other language is better suited for the banking sector than Cobol. Which incidentally is the one place where Cobol is used to this day. And why not? Why waste millions trying to hammer in a nail with a hacksaw? Why not use a language especially designed for that purpose? SQL is likewise a language especially tailored for its tasks. I don’t hear anyone bitching about how old and outdated that is. It wont grow old because it embodies the principle of relational data.

And just what exactly is old about Delphi? Generics? Posix support? Weak and strong references? Garbage collection? Attributes? class, record and enum helpers? Dependency injection? Model view controller frameworks? The ability to write assembler side by side with pascal? The ability to link with C/C++ objects? Cross compilation for Windows, OS X and mobile platforms? What manner of logic are you using where you praise other languages for these features, but for Delphi the same features makes it old? Stop repeating what someone once told you like a mindless parrot and investigate. You are an engineer, a field of science; start acting like one.

In my work I use several languages: JavaScript, Delphi, Smart Pascal, Mono C# and even Python. I have also fallen in love with LUA believe it or not.

For web-pages I prefer Smart pascal which compiles to JavaScript (node.js is fantastic). Then you have shell scripting, a touch of x86 assembly code, a dash of bash on my Linux box and .. well, there is strength in diversity.

It all depends on what is best for the customer and what language yields the most robust solution. Sometimes C# is better suited for my clients infrastructure, other times Delphi makes more sense. But if I was to pick a single language to cover all of them, it would either be object pascal or C++ (gcc). These really have no rivals and will never go away.

These are the compilers responsible for the foundation on which all other languages, operating-systems, applications and services rest. Remove those, and the whole house of cards come crashing down.

So using many languages is actually an enriching experience. It brings more depth to our way of thinking and (consequently) affect the quality of our products.

Anyways, I believe congratulations are in order, because if your favorite language is C#, you have in fact been using Delphi without knowing it. There is so much Delphi in C# and they both originate from the same author. So why not pay a visit to C#’s older brother?

So go download Delphi, Lazarus and Remobjects Oxygene – enjoy the decades of research and excellence these dialects represent. It won’t hurt you, it will probably do you a great deal of good.

Hire a Delphi superhero!

This is your chance to hire a Delphi super-hero, namely me! That’s right, I’m presently in the market for a new full-time job!

Note: if you need people for a short project then I personally must decline, but I can forward your position at Delphi Developer (4.000 Delphi developers) and here on my website (average of 15.000 visitors per month)

I must underline the obvious, namely that I live in Norway with no intention of moving. However, I have a fully established office which has been used for three consecutive years. So I am used to working remotely, communicating through Skype, Messenger, Google Meetup’s and similar utilities. This has worked brilliantly so far. Full time employment over the internet is finally a reality.

For Norwegian companies I can offer 50% commuting (100% in Vestfold) from Oslo to Akershus in the north, to Sandefjord and Larvik in the south. The reason I can only offer 50% is because I have custody for two children every other week, which means I am unable to drive long distances in combination with school and similar factors.

Jon Lennart Aasenden, 41 years old senior software engineer using Delphi

My experience is too long to list here, but if you are in the market for a dedicated software engineer then you have come to the right place. Simply drop me a line on e-mail (address at the end of this post) and I will get back to you with a full resume ASAP.

In short: I have worked with Delphi for 15 years, I am the author of Smart Mobile Studio and wrote the VJL (run-time library, similar to VCL) from scratch. I have worked for some of the biggest companies in Norway. I have good papers, excellent reputation and is recognized for my skill, positive attitude and “yes we can” mentality.

Before my 15 years of Delphi I spent roughly the same amount of time programming games, multimedia and contributing to the demo scene. In my view, demo programming is one of the most rewarding intellectual exercises you can engage in. It teaches you how to think and prepares you for “real life solutions” as a professional.

In my career as a Delphi developer I have written several commercial products; ranging from a complete invoice and credit management application, games and multimedia products, serial management components for Delphi, backup clients and much, much more.

No matter what your company works with, as long as it’s Delphi I’m the right man for the job.

My kind of job

It goes without saying that I am looking for a purely Delphi centric position. Although I have worked with C++ and C# and have no problems navigating and adding to such a codebase — there can be no doubt that Delphi is the environment where I excel at my work.

I bring with me a solid insight into HTML5/JavaScript and am willing to teach and educate your existing staff in Smart Mobile Studio, which I am also the founder and inventor of; bringing your team up to speed with the next step in computing: namely distributed cloud computing. At which JavaScript and Object Pascal play central roles.

Torro Invoice

So if you are moving towards cloud computing or want to leverage the cloud for service oriented architectures using RPC or REST servers, I am the guy you want to talk to. Especially if you want to use object pascal and leverage nodeJS, JavaScript and the whole spectrum of mobile devices. In short, with me on your team you will have a huge advantage.

What you get is 15 years of Delphi experience; and before that, 15 years of software authoring, demo and game development on 16 bit machines.

Good qualities

I have included a small list of “ad-hoc” qualifications. The list below does not serve as anything other than indicators. I have been a professional programmer for many, many years and to list every single piece of technology is pointless. But hopefully the list is enough to give you an idea of my qualifications, depth and diversity.

1. Write custom Delphi controls and UI widgets
2. Create control packages and resource management for our projects
3. Optimize procedures by hand by refactoring variables, parameters and datatypes.
4. Write a database engine from scratch and also use existing engines such as Elevatedb, MSSQL, Oracle, Firebird, SQLite and MySQL
5. Work with Windows API directly
6. Work with freepascal and port code to Linux and Macintosh
7. Write networking libraries, custom protocols and high-speed multithreaded servers
8. Use classical frameworks like Indy, Internet Direct and other out of box solutions
9. Write advanced parsers for source-code and any complex text-format
10. Write a real-life compiler and IDE (www.smartmobilestudio.com and quartexpascal.wordpress.com)
11. Create a graphics library from scratch, supporting different pixel formats
12. Work with large files, performing complex operations on gigabytes and terabytes
13. Write mobile and desktop applications using Smart Mobile Studio and FireMonkey
14. Create your server environment, architect your RPC (remote procedure call) service infrastructure
15. Implement custom services through nodeJS, Smart Mobile Studio, Delphi and FreePascal
16. Use Remobjects product line: such as RemObjects SDK, Hydra and Data-abstract
17. Link with C and C++ object files
18. Use project management tools, scrum, SVN, github and package management
19. Write, export and import DLL files; both written in and imported to Delphi
20. Write solid architectures using moderns technologies: xsl schemas, stylesheet validation, rest, node services

.. and much, much more!

Note: While you may not have a need for all of these qualifications (or any one of them), the understanding which the listed topics demand that I master is of great value to you as an employer. The more knowledge and hands-on experience a programmer can offer, the better qualified he is to deal with real-life problems.

Tools of the trade

All programmers have a toolbox with frameworks, code collections or third party components they use. These are the products I always try to use in projects. I have a huge library of components I have bought over the years, and I have no problem getting to know whatever toolkit you prefer. Below is a short list of my favorite tools, things I always carry with me to work.

• RemObjects SDK to isolate business logic in RPC servers, this allows us to use the same back-end for both desktop, mobile and html5 javascript.
• RemObject Data Abstract
• Remobjects Hydra
• ElevateDB and DBIsam (DBIsam for Delphi 7-2010, ElevateDB for the rest)
• Developer Express component suite
• TMS Aurelius database framework
• MyDac – MySQL data access components
• MSDac – Microsoft SQL server data access components
• Raize component suite
• FreePascal and Lazarus for OS X and Linux services
• Mono/C# when customers demands it (or Visual Studio)
• Firemonkey when that is in demand
• Smart Mobile Studio for mobile applications, cloud services [nodejs] and HTML5/Web

Tools and utilities

• Beyond compare (compare versions of the same file)
• Total commander (excellent search inside files in a directory, recursive)
• DBGen – A program written by me for turning Interbase/firebird databases into classes. Essentially my twist on Aurelius from TMS, except here you generate fixed classes in XML Data Mapping style.

Note: For large projects which needs customization I tend to write tools and converters myself. The DBgen tool was created when I worked at a company which used Firebird. They had two people who hand wrote wrapper classes for nearly 100 tables (!) They had used almost two months and covered about half. I wrote the generator in two days and it generates perfect wrappers for all tables in less than 10 minutes.

Safety first

As a father of three I am only interested in stable, long-term employments. Quick projects (unless we are talking six figures) are of no interest, nor do I want to work for startup groups or kickstarters. I am quite frankly not in a position to take risks; children comes first.

Many of my products are available for purchase online

I am used to working from my own office. I was initially skeptical to that, but it has turned out to work brilliantly. I am always available (within working hours Norwegian time) on Skype, Google, Messenger and phone.

Languages work format

For the past year I have been working full time with C# under Microsoft Visual Studio. Before that I used Mono for about four months, which I must admit I prefer over Visual Studio, and wrote a few iPhone and iPad apps. So I am not a complete stranger to C# or other popular languages. But as I have underlined in my posts on countless occations – object pascal is a better language. It is truly sad that Borland was brought down all those years ago, because with them they dragged what must be one of the most profound and influential languages of our time.

That said, I have no scruples about mixing and matching languages. Be it Remobjects Oxygene, C#, C++ or Object Pascal. I also do some mocking in BlitzBasic which is without question the fastest (execution wise) of the bunch, but not really suitable for enterprise level applications.

The point here being that I am versatile, prepared to learn new things and not afraid to ask. It would be a miracle if a man could walk through life without learning something new, so it’s important to show respect and be remain humble. Different languages represents different approaches to problem solving, and that is an important aspect of what it means to be a programmer.

The only thing I ask is that I am properly informed regarding the language you expect me to deliver in – and that I receive the required training or courseware in due time. Do not expect super-hero status in C#, I am absolutely above average, but it cannot be compared to my efficiency and excellence using Delphi.

Contact

If you are interested in hiring me for your company, then don’t hesitate to contact me for a resume. You may e-mail me at lennart.aasenden AT gmail dot com.

Is native outdated? Debate!

I sort of subscribe to the chaos theory

Life has its ups and downs, but this one is a case that really makes me stop and think. They say the moment you reach 30, you lose your immortality. In the sense that you no longer regard yourself as immortal, infallible and a list of other power-words. It’s the age when you realize that you are no longer in the front-seat of all things new and bright, and that in fact you are heading for death.

With that gloomy intro, here is the pickle that has made me really question what programming and being a “native” developer means: Is native code outdated? I write that because the more young programmers I meet, the less native code I encounter. And it’s really scary! I mean how do you build a custom server? Not just a server that does something different, but a truly custom, never before done, truly unique and brand new – without the speed power that native code provides?

But these kids have a completely different take on it, which makes me feel so very, very old. But it also makes me want to educate them about the differences, with limited success so far.

Once in a while I meet up with younger programmers, some at work and others through IRC or Facebook to check out the latest developments. It’s mostly open forum so everyone posts ideas, links, code, references – and we all bitch and moan about what we don’t like (or envy I guess, people do that as well online).

What throws me is that native code is taking up less and less space in the minds of young programmers. Programmers who, unlike our generation I presume, have primarily grown up with free development tools and open-source libraries. So in their mind paying for anything related to programming is just not where it’s at. Perhaps this is why Microsoft has suddenly transformed into the sugar daddy of high-tech? Time will tell perhaps.

But either way, the majority of these free tools must be running on what ultimately has be, it bloody has to be (!) native code. I accept that the platform itself can be script based, perhaps generating bytecodes or p-code. But native must by virtue of how the hardware is designed, remain relevant. Right?

The p-code thing

If you don’t know the difference between byte-codes and p-codes,  they are essentially the same thing. But instead of representing your commands as bytes and small records, like say java or dot net does; P-codes have bytes which represents offset values into a runtime library. So instruction $0001 would execute command #1, and $000F would execute command number 15 (or 16 if you count from zero). The downside of p-code compilers is that they are extremely fragile. If you alter even a single byte the whole system can crash, so modern implementations use CRC and checksum validation before executing.

Since a p-code represents an offset into an array of pointers, they execute extremely fast. In many cases it can be hard to distinguish native programs from well written p-code programs. It depends wildly on the language at hand naturally, but all in all p-codes just pounds every ounce of clock cycles out of the processor.

The downside is that it’s fragile like hell. A single altered byte in a p-code program can crash the program with spectacular access-violations. Hence modern implementations are often cluttered with CRC checks and identifiers. But they are fast, much faster than translating byte-codes.

Right, now back to the topic at hand.

Is the future scripted?

A part of me want to say yes, because there is more than enough power in modern script-engines to create really powerful desktop applications, services and/or games. But a script engine can’t write itself. You can’t write a script engine in JavaScript because sooner or later someone has to write JavaScript, if you get what I mean. Somewhere along the line a programmer has to use a language which compiles to native, be it C / C++, object pascal or some other native language. I even remember a guy writing his own operating system in BlitzBasic, but he used like 70% inline assembler so I’m not sure he qualifies as a basic representative.

So while it’s tempting to say yes, considering the widespread adoption of languages like python, pearl, ruby and javascript – it just can’t be true. And that statement has launched an avalanche of well-meaning but ignorant feedback from my younger friends; who doesn’t know what native is all about and as such protect their faith in scripting to the death.

So no. You can’t get through to them.

The smart thing

Since myself and the group of programmers I work with are marketing object pascal as the best language for web and cloud development; and we have adapted object pascal to be more in-tune with how development in our day and age works, like anonymous procedures, records, properties and whatnot — i should be pro 100% script right?

Well I’m not. Smart Mobile Studio represents, in my view, one of the best solutions for writing cloud based software. Primarily because you have full access to nodeJS, which in turn mean you can write both the server and client from the same codebase.

The secret lab that shall not be named

But it’s only the best solution because the medium, namely the browser and JavaScript, is so fluid and flamboyant in nature. You can do some tricks in JavaScript that would be suicide under native languages, but in the padded room of JavaScript everything goes.

But does that mean I have become sort of “anti native code”? Absolutely not. In fact I love Delphi to pieces, and C# (native mono compilation) and I even have an off the record love affair with C++. First of all because it’s the only thing I know how to do, part from JavaScript which I’m very, very good at. But I also think it’s important for all of us to get our ducks in a row.

The view I have is that scripting is not really programming is it? I mean “really” programming. Scripting for me is a bit like sculpting. You sit down and sculpt data structures and setup boundaries using a language which, subjectively speaking, is the intellectual equivalent of putty rather than brick. So it’s a bit like carving a madonna out of a piece of soap versus a solid piece of engineering forged in steel.

Or how about this: native programming is a bit like coding a gene-pool, while scripting is the same as body-building. With scripts you carve out the form, the relations and setup the pathways between them. But without the underlying generic programming, there would be no intelligence or program to carry out the build-plans to begin with.

Native languages feel more edgy to me, more solid and concrete. You can’t cheat and get away with it under native object pascal or C, because it wont even compile. You are also closer to the hardware since the code you write is ultimately the binary pattern fed to the processor. While scripting languages are.. well, fed to a dispatcher after going through a lookup table.

A young solution

I really am amazed by how the younger generation solve things, because they are – without knowing it – doing a better job than we did 20 years ago. Instead of writing a server from scratch like we would probably do for a new piece of technology, they implement the “new” bit using the protocols already in place. So they get the job done, but in a way very different from ours.

So the new server is not a new server, it’s the same old HTTP server you have been using for 15 years, except now the URL’s are command and form-fields are parameters. Things like REST was not invented by a seasoned developer, it’s actually a perversion of the HTTP protocol if you like. But it works, and it’s even turned into a standard now.

Kids are growing up with pre-fabricated clouds where we had Atari and C-64.

Same with python. You dont setup a cluster with C or object pascal, no you use python and it will execute parts of the same program on different computers to spread the payload. And that makes sense, since native code would be much harder to disperse over X number of nodes. So suddenly scripting makes sense over native. At least in that particular scenario.

The only real problem with “young thinking” is that it doesn’t generate money the same way we are used to. When you use only free compilers, editors and server kits – how will a young developer approach systems like Delphi?

I really want Delphi to survive and I want the object pascal language, be it Smart Pascal, FPC or Delphi or Oxygene; I want it to thrive. I want young programmers to see and experience how rich and beautiful object pascal is and how much it can do for them; and also how much they can deliver through that language.

But how can you even hope to persuade a young man or woman who makes less than $800 a month to fork out $3000 for a development system all their friends call “old and outdated”?

AppMethod is cool. It’s cheap, its affordable and students and hobbyist programmers can pick it up. It’s still a bit pricey compared to Smart Mobile Studio, but I hope Embarcadero makes enough money to keep going.

Last pondering

Smart Mobile Studio is probably more in tune with the new reality, since the kids growing up now are in fact growing up with “the cloud” as their foundation. Remember we grew up with commodore 64, Atari and those kind of things. Our children are growing up with cloud servers, JavaScript powered phones (Mozilla phone), Linux and the open source movement.

Perhaps I should just forget trying to make sense of their thinking. Trying to enumerate all the technological changes I have gone through from childhood to now is exhausting. I tried to tell my son what a modem was and how we connected to the internet no longer than 15 years ago — he just looked at me with big eyes and went “Dad. Please. Its ancient history”. And my daughter found a cassette tape and could not imagine what it was. She thought it was scotch tape 🙂

It’s just so weird realizing that my kids have no idea what a cassette tape is and will never have first hand experience of a modem!

I guess we all play our part.

My part is to try to get object pascal kicking and screaming onto the cloud. I am content with that role and think it’s a privilege to even be mentioned in the history of object pascal. But a future based on scripting? I sure hope not!

What are the kids using?

When it comes to languages, I can honestly say that the official list is wrong. Dead wrong. One language may have more source online that others, but that doesnt mean it’s less used. It depends completely on what group of people use it and what it’s used for. A language used primarily for commercial applications will by nature have less code in the public domain than a language which is free, open-source and generally available.

This is the case we see with Delphi. There are probably hundreds of thousands of companies using Delphi in the world, but they use Delphi to produce closed-source products. As such their code never leaves the house (so to speak) and you wont find it on github, sourceforge or google code.

But having talking to probably hundreds of teenagers coding lately, here is my general impression, in order of magnitude

• JavaScript
• Php
• Python
• Ruby
• Swift
• C# and dot net
• C script
• Erlang and friends

Of native languages the list havent really changed that much over the years:

• C++
• C
• Objective C
• Object Pascal

The javascript thing is the one to watch. Not just because that’s where I’ve invested my time and money, but because no other language is seeing anything near the amount of attention JS is getting. Not even close. And the two basic platforms is the browser, which for kids is regarded as the operative system itself (conceptually, not factually ofcourse). The browser IS where you experience computing and connect to the world.

The second aspect and one I find very exciting myself, is the nodeJS side of things. Here we are seeing a tremendous growth compared to other technology. And the reason is exactly because it’s connected to the first-hand experience people have. Those who master the browser and the DOM will eventually be able to reach customers and create systems which are platform independent, international and dynamic.

Do we have anything to learn from this? Bucket loads! But we should never lose sight of the fact that we also have much to teach.

And with that my pondering stops for today 🙂

Smart Mobile Studio, customize your new IDE

The smart mobile studio designer has never really been any good. We wanted to use a commercial designer at one point, but due to technical limitations in the components we were unable to do so. In short, having more than one instance of a designer in the application caused some serious conflicts and instability.

Instead we decided to stick with our own variation, most of us never really used the designer because are used to FreePascal, C# and library coding under Delphi. The designer for iOS in XCode on the mac is hopeless, we we tend to create even the design in our code. So this decision didn’t have such a hard impact on us. Sadly that was not the case for our users who wanted to design HTML5 interfaces without the clutter of Dreamweaver or dullness of Web-Matrix.

So I can only say I’m sorry we had to do this, but the code generation and support for hardware was more important at the time.

But times change, and right now it’s the tools that needs attention! All in all you will be happy to learn that in the next update which is just around the corner, the designer and all it’s features has received a lot of love!

The Delphi style designer in action

First, don’t let my insanely blue color theme in the picture above bother you, I was just playing around with the palette. You are free to either disable theme support or pick another which suits your taste better. The same goes for the text-editor colors. The IDE now ships with several preset-files, and you can create your own palette which can be saved, loaded and made default with a single click.

But back to the designer, what is really exciting is that we actually have 3 different designer modes (!) These are:

• iOS
• Delphi
• Wireframe

In the picture above we are using the Delphi inspired visual designer. It’s a bit dull but I must admit that for me this is the most familiar to use; and holy cow is it fast compared to our previous layout control! Christian has really outdone himself this time and created a designer we can all be proud of.

The first designer was my concoction, I never got to finish it and while it worked quite well with ordinary components, it was ill suited for threaded rendering which is required by the webkit engine. So Christian pretty much had to throw everything out and write it from scratch using Graphics32 (which he has helped create).

For those interested, take a second to contemplate just what takes place inside our designer at any given point. Because it’s not “simple” X/Y coding:

As you create your layout we actually build a small program of your layout, where all the components are created and positioned out. This tiny program is then compiled in a separate thread, and ultimately rendered by the WebKit engine to an off-screen pixmap. We then talk to JavaScript directly from Delphi and enum the position (including rotated and/or scaled offsets) for each control -before we grab the control pixels and cache them in buffers associated with each designer-element (phew!).

In short, this is how you can move and render HTML5 controls around inside a Delphi/FPC program just like they were ordinary VCL/FCL controls. Pretty neat right?

Either way, whatever our problems with the designer were in the past, that is now ancient history! The new form-designer is silky smooth, pixel perfect, easy to use and very, very fast!

Themes, palette and your taste in bling

Another really fantastic collection of features is how the new IDE deals with colors. We all love them and we all have different perception of what good UI design is like.

Well finally we have added the same amount of (if not more) options as Microsoft Visual Studio — from being able to customize the code editor, the gutter section and the mini-map; to applying a full theme to the IDE in general. Below is a picture of the IDE using a different theme from the image above.

Personalize the IDE just the way you want it

My personal favorites are “Amethyst Kamri “and and “Smokey Quartz Kamri”. Some love them and others hate them. But at least you have options to change the general look and feel of the IDE! And if you hate skinning and tweaking colors, just pick the default Windows theme and load in a bog-standard Lazarus/Delphi editor preset.

When we combine all this tweaking freedom with the completely overhauled and completely dockable IDE sections, you can pretty much personalize around 90% of the application.

A forgotten feature

The class browser was a great idea borrowed from the C# Mono project, but sadly we had to down-prioritize it earlier on – and it has remained in a sort of “limbo state” since version 1.2.

In the next update you will discover that we decided to give that old gem some love too and it really shows! Indexing is faster than ever, and searching for classes and methods is finally, after what seem like ages – efficient and useful!

The class browser was never created to be documentation. If you have some experience with C# or C++ through the mono project, you will know that a class-browser is just for searching up classnames/methods without having to change file or CTRL-Click out of your current unit.

C# programmers use this like mad, and assigns it to a clever key-combo. The .net framework is huge so remembering everything is impossible. Also, when focusing on a difficult task it’s not always productive having to scroll to the top of the unit, CTRL+Click on another unit, then CTRL+F to search (and so on). If all you want is the name of that class or a member –thats what the class browser is for. Nothing more, nothing less.

Finally it’s a breeze to hunt down a class to inspect it’s members

More to come

Over the past 2 weeks I have availed more and more features. And we are not done yet. There have been plenty of fixes and advancements in the compiler, linker and how applications are put together. So you have plenty to look forward to!

I have already mentioned quite a bit about the RTL changes, but not all — so stay tuned for more insight into what is without a doubt the best release of Smart Mobile Studio since 1.2 (!)

Smart Mobile Update, oh man this rocks!

Do you sometimes feel a bit envious of C# programmers with all their cool IDE features? Like automatic updates, built-in package manager which downloads, installs and does all the grunt work for you? I mean, Visual Studio’s nuget package manager looks almost like appstore, but with free packages which can be installed with a click.

I know I have. Being a Delphi/FPC programmer can be tiresome. Especially when it comes to component updates, RTL updates and god knows what else you have to manually deal with.

Well then It’s with great please I assume the role of whistleblower and show you a “peek” of the upcoming Smart Mobile Studio update architecture. That’s right, while you were sleeping we were building a server infrastructure – and one of the features is about to emerge publicly!

Oh look, it does everything for us!

Updates for all

Imagine this: Someone at HQ locates a bug in one of the RTL units. Today this means registering a case in fogbugz, providing reproducible code and much, much more. And depending on how critical it is – it can take a while before the ticket comes up to be fixed.

Our new system allows us to do immediate updates. So whenever we add a new feature or fix a bug, it’s fixed straight away — and it is available immediately. All you have to do is click “update” once in a while and you get all the changes, just like Visual Studio and Mono users do!

And we have channels, meaning different branches you can check out, like “Beta” and “Nightly builds” and so on. But please note that these are reserved for paying customers only. The update system takes care of license validation, tracking – updating your executables as well as the VJL + RTL codebase. So this is more or less a perfect solution for serious HTML5/Pascal programmers as you can get. And dont get me started on automatic package installation (ops! Did I say that out loud? Darn…).

I soooooo want to blow the whistle on our other features, but I can’t! Not yet. But the moment they are ready for public ears, rest assured that I’ll play the proverbial bagpipe on all of them 😀

Enjoy!

System.Interop “how to” for Smart Mobile Studio

Smart Mobile Studio and the dialect “Smart Pascal” has roots in the Object Pascal community. The compiler and toolkit is written purely using FreePascal and Delphi, and naturally the run-time library for Smart Pascal is heavily influenced by both.

Background

What is less known is that Smart Mobile Studio in general, both the IDE and the RTL architecture, is equally inspired by the Mono project. The entire layout of the IDE is almost identical to Mono-Develop as it existed 4 years ago, while the RTL and application framework borrows from MonoTouch by exposing central constructs (like TApplication) purely through partial classes. These are language features which does not exist in FreeePascal or Embarcadero Delphi.

The unit Interop.pas which is a part of the system namespace (system.interop) is inspired by the mono .NET equivalent. Under Mono the various memory and type transformation classes are spread out over many different locations. Under Smart Mobile Studio we have decided to collect and implement these .NET features in a single unit. Namely system.interop (short for: System interoperability).

The Smart RTL is seriously fast

Memory management under HTML5

JavaScript does not expose any form of memory management. The closest thing to allocating memory under JavaScript is through JArrayBuffer and JTypedArray. JArrayBuffer is an un-typed memory segment without read or write access. The buffer can only be accessed by creating a descendant of JTypedArray and connecting that to JArrayBuffer. As such:

/* Allocate memory buffer, 1024 bytes */
var memBuffer = new ArrayBuffer(1024);

/* Allocate R/W access through a typed array */
var memAccess = new UInt8Array( memBuffer );

Needless to say, working with memory like this quickly becomes tiredsome, error prone and messy. Especially when coming from a FreePascal or Delphi background, where a simple call to AllocMem() is enough to reserve memory on the heap.

Memory Management under Smart Mobile Studio

The Interop unit introduces 3 different means of working directly with memory, there are:

• Streams
• Memory Buffers
• Marshaled classical memory access

Marshaled memory access

Due to the shortcomings of JavaScript the only way to expose and work directly with memory is through a technique called marshaling. It essentially means that you are abstracted from pure machine localized addresses (pointer types) and instead operate with reference objects (location objects).

Such a reference object contains two pieces of information:

• A reference (handle) to the associated JArrayBuffer
• An entrypoint (offset) into the arraybuffer

For instance, under classical object pascal the following code is quite common:

// pointer type containing the address
var
mBuffer: PByte;

// Allocate memory
mBuffer:=AllocMem(1024);
try
  // Work with memory here
finally
  // Release memory
  freemem(mBuffer);
end;

Using marshaled objects Smart Mobile Studio is capable of delivering the exact same:

// pointer type containing the address
var
mBuffer: TAddress;

// Allocate memory
mBuffer:=TMarshal.allocMem(1024);
try
  //work with memory here
finally
  // Release memory
  TMarshal.freemem(mBuffer);
end;

Marshaled references also have the benefit of helper functions. So advancing further into an allocated segment is done via the TAddress.Addr() function.

// pointer type containing the address
var
mBuffer: TAddress;

// Allocate memory
mBuffer:=TMarshal.allocMem(1024);
try
  mBuffer:=mBuffer.Addr(2); //Advance reference by 2 bytes
finally
  // Release memory
  TMarshal.freemem(mBuffer);
end;

Since JavaScript is garbage collected we can also approach memory offsets quick and dirty, like below; Fact is we really dont need to call FreeMem() because the garbage collector will come around and clean up after us later. But sloppy code has a proven negative impact on performance (memory fragmentation leads to sudden cpu spikes as the GC get’s busy), so I strongly advice you to stick with best practices object pascal.

var mBuffer: TAddress := TMarshal.allocMem(1024).addr(2);

Access to memory with such elegance is unheard of in the world of JavaScript. Marshaled reference objects can be found in many languages, but we are the first to introduce this for JavaScript. The speed benefit is likewise phenomenal compared to other solutions. In fact, our initial read/write tests outperformed all versions of native Embarcadero Delphi prior to Delphi XE.

Memory buffers

While marshaled references and memory allocations are essential for legacy compatability, porting code from freepascal or Delphi to HTML5 – being able to directly interact with a memory segment is vital for any modern platform.

As such, the Interop unit provides the TMemory class. Using the methods of this class you can allocate, release, move, copy, export, read and write directly to memory. The class implements caching for maximal speed enhancement. All intrinsic JavaScript datatypes are supported (Int16, Int32, Float32, Float64, String, Boolean).

Special attention should be made to the class-procedure Move() and Fill() which are equal to the classical FreePascal and Delphi variations. Unlike their classical counterparts these methods accepts TMemoryHandle rather than Pointer or marshaled TAddress objects.

Using Move with Marshaled Addresses

The TAddress class exposes a property named “Segment” of type TMemoryHandle. This can be used with Move() and Fill() as demonstrated below:

var
  src: TAddress;
  dst: TAddress;

TMemory.Move(
        src.segment,     // source memory
        src.entrypoint,  // source offset
        dst.segment,     // target memory
        dst.Entrypoint,  // target offset
        500              //bytes to move
        );

TMemory.Fill(
        src.segment,
        src.entryPoint,
        500,
        TDatatype.CharToByte("Z")
        );

It must be noted that the above code is just for explanation. Both Move() and FillChar() are implemented in the TMarshal class. The above demonstration is just to provide reference material on their use and how marshaled memory works.

Converting data

JavaScript is essentially type-less. The concept of “typed-arrays” was implemented a while back because they represent a significant speed boost. No matter if you are working on complex calculations or want to manipulate pixels on byte level, being able to work directly with memory is essential for inter-operability with other languages and file-formats.

Converting intrinsic (built in types) to binary can be very hard under JavaScript. As of writing, Smart Mobile Studio provides the most accurate and fastest means of doing this.

The class TDatatype provides methods for converting intrinsic datatypes to “array of bytes” and also from TByteArray back into intrinsic values. The class itself uses speed optimalization by pre-allocating conversion space when the unit is loaded into memory. This makes data conversion extremely fast, much faster than any other JavaScript solution out there.

Using TDatatype is very easy:

var
  x: Integer;
  mData: TByteArray;

// convert int32 value $1200 into 4 bytes
mData := TDatatype.Int32ToBytes($1200);

// write bytes to the console
for x:=0 to mData.length-1 do
writeln(mData[x]);

// Alter first byte just for fun
mData[0]:=$FF;

// Write modified integer value to the console
Writeln( TDataType.BytesToInt32(mData) );

The following methods are provided by TDatatype for conversion of datatypes:

  TDatatype = Class
  public
    class property  Bits:TBitAccess;
    class function  Int16ToBytes(Value:Integer):TByteArray;
    class function  Int32ToBytes(Value:Integer):TByteArray;
    class function  Float64ToBytes(Value:Float64):TByteArray;
    class function  Float32ToBytes(Value:Float32):TByteArray;
    class function  StringToBytes(Value:String):TByteArray;
    class function  BooleanToBytes(Value:Boolean):TByteArray;

    class function  BytesToInt16(const Data:TByteArray):Integer;
    class function  BytesToInt32(const Data:TByteArray):Integer;
    class function  BytesToFloat32(Const Data:TByteArray):Float;
    class function  BytesToFloat64(Const Data:TByteArray):Float;
    class function  BytesToString(const Data:TByteArray):String;
    class function  BytesToBoolean(const data:TByteArray):Boolean;

    class function  StrToBase64(Value:String):String;
    class function  Base64ToStr(Value:String):String;

    class function  ByteToChar(Const Value:Byte):String;
    class function  CharToByte(const Value:String):Byte;

    class function  StrToTypedArray(value:String):TJSByteClass;
    class function  TypedArrayToStr(const value:TJSByteClass):String;
  end;

Working with bits

The TDatatype class exposes a class-property named TBitAccess, which contains only class methods for manipulating bits. As of writing the following methods exists:

  TBitAccess = Class
    public
      class function  Get(Const index:Integer;Const Value:Byte):Boolean;
      class function  &Set(Const Index:Integer;Const Value:Byte;
                      const Data:Boolean):Byte;
      class function  Count(Const Value:Byte):Integer;
      class function  ToByteString(const Value:Byte):String;
      class function  FromByteString(const Value:String):Byte;
      class function  Dismantle(const Value:Byte):TByteArray;
      class function  Assemble(const Value:TByteArray):Byte;
  end;

Note: TMemory also exposes getBit and setBit methods for the whole allocated memory. This allows you to use a whole segment as a bit-buffer. This is often used by compression, sound generators and classes which communicates with hardware (see Smart Support for hardware platforms).

Working with Streams

While marshaled memory allocations and TMemory represents fast and direct access to raw data, RTL software typically base themselves on streams. In essence Streams and buffers represent the same thing, except that a stream maintains a cursor which is automatically updated as you advance through the content.

Smart Pascal implements the base-class “TStream” which is a purely abstract stream class, just like it exists under C#, FreePascal and Delphi. Deriving from this is TMemoryStream and TStringStream. We will no doubt add more streams to the mix at a later date, but due to the nature of HTML5 and the restrictions on JavaScript, file-streams serve little purpose at this point in time.

Using streams is done much like under FreePascal and Delphi:

var
  mStream: TMemoryStream;

mStream:=TMemoryStream.Create;
try
  // use stream here
finally
  mStream.free;
end;

Reading and writing to streams can either be done directly using TStream.Write() or TStream.Read(), both these methods accepts an array of byte (TByteArray). This makes streams slower to use than TMemory or TMarshal operations.

var
  mStream: TMemoryStream;
  mWriter: TStreamWriter;

mStream:=TMemoryStream.Create;
try
  mWriter:=mStream.createWriter;
  mWriter.WriteInt32($1200);
  mWriter.WriteString("This is how you write to a stream!");
  mWriter.WriteFloat64(139.68504);
finally
  mStream.free;
end;

Reading is done via TStreamReader, which you can either create manually or obtain via the TStream.CreateReader() method.

Speed comparison

JavaScript is seriously fast. Much faster than you would imagine, all things considering.

In the first test, which writes 100.000 records into a pre-allocated TMemory instance, we get the following results:

    mMake.Allocate(2100021);
    mStart:=Now;
    mChunk:=0;
    for x:=0 to 100000 do
    begin
      mMake.Write(mChunk + 0,$AAAA0000);
      mMake.WriteFloat32(mChunk + 4,19.24);
      mMake.WriteFloat64(mChunk + 8,24.18);
      mMake.Write(mChunk + 16,false);
      mMake.write(mChunk + 17,$0000AAAA);
      inc(mChunk, 21);
    end;
    mStop:=Now;

Time to completion: 0 seconds, 46 milliseconds

In the second test we omit pre-allocation, which will force TMemory to grow and re-allocate it’s cache quite often, depending on the size of the cache (4096 bytes in this case):

Time to completion: 0 seconds, 445 milliseconds

In the third test we do the exact same, but this time using streams and streamwriter. To fully understand what is happening here, for each write, consider the following:

1. StreamWriter calls TDatatype to convert the intrinsic value into a TByteArray
2. StreamWriter calls TStream to write the data
3. TStream maintains a TMemory class, and calls the rather slow Write() operation
4. TStream’s TMemory instance has no pre-allocation, and as such re-allocation will occur often

Time to completion: 0 seconds, 519 milliseconds

These numbers are almost ridicules. I thought something was wrong somewhere at first, and had to check that data was actually written and that it had written the data properly. But yes, the above numbers are correct and memory access under JavaScript when done right is beyond anything I have seen elsewhere.

As of writing my code is roughly two times faster than Perl and Python, it’s also faster than any native Embarcadero Delphi version except Delphi XE7. Only FreePascal and C# Mono compiled to machine-code using LLVM optimization is capable of performance like this. Which is to some degree embarrassing and humiliating for Delphi, a product costing 100 times more than Smart Mobile Studio.

On the positive side, it spells a bright future for Smart Mobile Studio, especially when interacting with nodeJS and hardware, which require powerful and fast code.

Compiling to .net with Smart Mobile Studio

You are probably thinking this is too good to be true, but it’s not. In fact, I have a working prototype already (although it needs a hell of a lot of work). But since people seem to think this is either a blatant lie, or that I’m doing black magic to get this working, I’m going to explain how I do it!

In fact, I have provided links to all the parts you need on this post, so you can download, compile and play around with the tech yourself. But first, some context 🙂

Smart Mobile Studio has a kick-ass compiler. This compiler takes object pascal, parses, tokenizes it and turns it into an AST (abstract symbol tree, where every command, variable, statement etc. is turned into an object in memory). This AST is then analysed by a code-generator (codegen) which turns the AST into JavaScript.

Since Smart Mobile Studio has been in sale for a couple of years I don’t think I need to explain or prove that point as well.

It’s ALIVE! It’s ALIVE! MOHAHAHAHA

But .net is a completely different beast. But only when you are looking at .net from the outside. I am also a C# developer so I also look at Delphi and Smart from inside C#.

In short: The .net framework has one huge advantage over native languages, and that is something called reflection. Reflection is not just RTTI, like some people have voiced. It’s also the ability to hot-swap code modules in a living program, because bytecodes are just that – byte codes. Since .net is a “virtual language” you can do all sorts of cool stuff with it, like changing a program at runtime.

But the one feature that sets .net apart from Java, which works pretty much along the same lines, is the ability to also emit code. Thats right, you can take a class and emit it to disk from you program. But it doesn’t stop there.

You can also compile new code from within your own program, by building something called expression-trees. This is pretty much what all compilers does (including smart mobile studio), because an expression-tree is a fancy way of saying “AST”.

So you can programmatically build up a full expression tree from within your C# program.

Any bells ring yet?

He he. What you do is of-course to construct an expression-tree and then use the emitter to dump that as an assembly, and voila — you have in fact generated a separate, self-sustaining assembly! It’s a bit more complex than that, but essentially that’s how you do it.

The other kids are doing it

Some guy picked up this years ago and he decided to build a JavaScript compiler. So he built a full JavaScript compiler which parses, tokenizes and does everything a compiler should – and generates an expression-tree — and voila, he emits the code to disk and what you get is a compiled, fully working MS-CIL generated assembly (read: a DLL file that can be executed or used in your .NET projects).

Compiles without much mayhem on my mac

When you load in this assembly into Visual Studio, you will find that all the function names are exported as symbols, so you can happily call your now compiled JavaScript code from C# or Visual Basic.

Pretty cool right? The speed benefits alone are phenomenal, because the assembly is compiled to highly optimized machine code when it’s loaded the first time.

What about Smart Mobile Studio?

Since Smart Mobile Studio generates JavaScript, and Jurassic generates CIL from JavaScript — I guess I don’t need to tell you where this is heading, or that in fact it’s possible to achieve.

In fact, if you don’t believe me, clone out your own GIT version of Jurassic, load up Visual Studio (Visual Studio 2013 Community edition is free) and play around with the code yourself.

Will this become a part of Smart Mobile Studio?

Time will tell. We have more than enough work on our plates to start throwing .net into the mix right now, but I do find the route interesting. It would represent a much better way than the one Borland started ages ago, since the Smart Pascal dialect would be 100% retained. We have already gotten rid of pointers, so Smart Pascal is perfectly suited for the .net framework. You wouldn’t even need to think about .net, just write ordinary Smart Pascal.

Why should this be cool?

It opens up XBOX development first and foremost, followed by native Mono and Desktop development. This means you can write games that targets both HTML5, Mobile and XBOX with the same codebase. That should make developers happy I think.

And then there is ASP.net to think about. Thats probably one of the most important technologies in my view.

Well — fun thing to play with!

DelphiArmy.com is now a reality

Well I guess congratulations are in order – we, the object pascal community now have our very own job service! Today I bought the software, database and hosting solution, which means that in a matter of days you will be able to visit delphiarmy.com and register as either employer or developer!

The service is global, meaning that it can be used by anyone, be they European, American, from the Middle-East, Africa or Asia. The server was setup yesterday (16 december), the DNS pointer is being set today, add a couple of days tuning, and it will be online

Welcome to the #1 site online for Delphi work

To date I only know of a single website which promotes Delphi jobs, somewhere in France, so for all means and purposes DelphiArmy.com will be the #1 site for object-pascal developers to look for work; and for companies to find serious employees with a solid background in pascal software development.

• Delphi
• Delphi .net
• Smart Mobile Studio
• Remobjects Oxygene
• FreePascal / Lazarus
• DWScript
• Remobjects Pascal Script
• InnoSetup
• C++ Builder

Features for developers

You will be happy to know that you can both upload your resume (or create one directly on-site), and also connect to your linked-in profile. This should be a great time-saver. Personally I hate having to fill out the same CV on X number of websites. Well, if you already have a nice linked-in profile you can import that.

Video presentations are likewise possible, but I have yet to decide if this should be allowed due to storage concerns.

In short: all the features you would expect from a professional job portal is in place.

• Upload resume files
• Linked-In support
• Great search functionality
• Online CV builder
• Video presentation
• Recommendations
• Email notification
• Very reasonable registration fees (one time only)
• Mobile app (in progress)
• .. and more

I will also write articles about remote-work, what you need and what you should expect when applying for positions in Norway and Scandinavia at large. Similar articles will be provided for North-America, the Middle-East (Dubai) and Asia.

Features for Employers

• Option for making your position features (front side spot)
• Head-hunting services
• Very reasonable fees (access subscription options).
• Full access to our database of registered developers
• Developer Feedback option
• Email notification
• .. and more

Your support

I hope I have your support in this endeavor, that you will take the time to register with the service and use it. While you may have a steady job right now, you might be open for weekend work? Perhaps your life will change in six months and you will be looking for a new job. It makes sense to register, both for the community and yourself.

There are thousands of companies, both large and small, using Delphi on a daily basis around the world, sadly each of them live on their own ant-hill and have for some reason stopped talking to each other. Well, let’s get organized and start talking again. And like all great things in life, it begins with someone backing their ideas with action.

Investing in object pascal

As mentioned there are thousands of companies involved with Delphi around the globe. Many of them are maintaining legacy systems, many of them are developing new products – while others express insecurity if Delphi is worth investing in. Now one of the factors which has led to such thinking, has to do with visibility of Delphi (read: object pascal in all it’s forms) in the marketplace and more importantly: the availability of professional Delphi programmers.

Delphi and object-pascal in general has no “official” organ which takes care of promotion and/or open job positions. As a result people have no clue where to look, and end up using local newspapers or recruitment agencies. Until now there havent been a place where employers could reach out to find quality personnel fluent in Delphi. But what they do find are portals dedicated to Java, C#, even PHP and Ruby jobs.

As an example, the company I work for which is one of the biggest in Norway, have spent months trying to find a high-quality Delphi developer for their POS department. It took me less than 2 days to get them 20+ CV’s from professional Delphi programmers. Why? Because I know where to look. I also run Delphi Developer on Facebook with more than 2.600 active members, which I built exactly for that purpose: to get active people talking and working together.

So both employers and developers are there, in the thousands — we just need to connect them.

Sincerely

Jon Lennart Aasenden

Delphi for dot net unit

I had a rather long discussion with several members of Delphi developer (Facebook) the other day, mostly in response to be becoming a full-time C# developer (and Delphi developer of-course, that’s not gonna change).

Although we started with debating C# and differences between native object-pascal versus the “curly languages” in general, I ended up saying something that clearly bugged a few, namely: We can actually implement the dot net framework as an alternative to the VCL, written in Delphi itself. There is no technical limitation against it, and it may even benefit object pascal in general – as younger developers are more familiar with dot net than they are the VCL or VJL.

As you probably guess that spawned some interesting comments (nothing bad, important to underline that) – most of the comments along the lines of the task being pointless, technically difficult or just plain impractical.

My reply to this is that you are all wrong (he said with a smile).

First of all, it is not more impractical to use clone of the most evolved, modern run-time-library (framework) than it is to use the VCL. Delphi is in reality suffering great injustice due to the in-grown identification of product, language and RTL as one and the same. In fact, many people are completely spellbound by the concept of object pascal being “Delphi”, that they cannot for their life imagine object pascal with a new RTL.

This is something I have had first-hand experience with, since I wrote the RTL for Smart Mobile Studio and was the first to experience the wave of feedback from both happy and unhappy users. Dont get me wrong, I absolutely love the VCL; It’s component model and class hiearcy has stood the test of time. It scales well, it’s agile – and all the other words we use to describe a living product.

Technical difficulties

Secondly, it is no more a technical challenge to implement the .net framework and use that instead of the VCL – than it would be to write the VCL to begin with. The factor which matters in this case, as it is with software development in general, is time.

But this statement does have some merit, since it’s only recently that object pascal (both Delphi and FPC) have evolved it’s RTTI functionality. This was a requirement to bring generics and “C++ and C#” type RTTI access and management to Delphi. And as always the FPC group followed suit – which we should be thankful for.

The only technical challenges that requires a fair bit of research and testing can be isolated in 3 groups:

• Fundamental differences in serialization
• Object life-time differences
• Native code lacks the ability to emit reflection and alter itself at runtime

Why do it at all?

And last but not least, to the question of why; The answer is that the dot net framework has quickly become the dominant framework. People like to believe that C++ is in the lead here, or even JavaScript which tops the code evolution charts, but that is not the case. The dot net framework is used by millions of programmers every single day, both young and old alike. No other framework has the same level of exposure; Microsoft has successfully installed their framework onto every Windows PC on the planet – and with their recently announced “open source” initiative — the dot net framework will become and important part of Unix, Linux and OS X.

Being able to offer customers a framework they already know – but with a twist: namely that it compiles to native code, fast, relentless and which is emitted as a single executable — is more effective than presenting something utterly alien to young programmers. The same can be done with ordinary .net or mono apps through the executable image tool – which generates a single .exe with no dependencies of your C# code.

Porting over important libraries from C# becomes substantially easier if at least a subset of the dot net framework can be mapped to C# in 1:1 fashion.

C# lacks many of the features which makes object pascal so attractive; A native dot net “clone” RTL, which would replace the VCL completely, would benefit from many of the already existing VCL classes — and also from the language features unique to object pascal.

Proof of concept

To make a long story short; I have implemented a handful of the fundamental dot net classes. I have only spent an afternoon on this, so dont expect miracles, but at least it implements the basic .net serialization engine (the .net framework actually has 3 engines for serialization, few people are aware of that).

And to be frank, it’s already so much more easier to use than vanilla VCL. Now dont start a flame-war because of that statement. I love the VCL and use it every single day — but one of the more time-consuming tasks I can think of, is to write persistent code (if your components expose fields of a non-standard datatype).

A second nail in the proverbial coffin is that Delphi’s persistence is exclusively binary. A lot of frameworks have alternatives for this, like mORMot, Remobjects and TMS’s Aurelius (which I really love, since it’s purely attribute based), but vanilla object pascal as delivered by Embarcadero still ships with TPersistent which havent evolved since it’s inception ages ago.

C# and other .net languages have built in serialization out of the box. It’s a very simple form of serialization, but due to it’s decoupled nature – where property identifier is separated from property data (so you can emit XML text to a binary medium) it’s very effective.

It’s also fully automatic, unless you explicitly turn it off. So under C# you can write a “normal” class as such:

/* Bog standard class. We inherit from ISerializable,
   and we also tag the class with the "Serializable" attribute */
[Serializable()]
public class TMyClass: ISerializable {
  public int Value { get; set; }
  public string Name { get; set; }
}

The above is identical to this object-pascal code. The VCL rule for persistence is that only published properties are automatically persisted by the VCL, and the property must be a non-complex type (e.g “standard datatypes like integer, string, double and so on). The problem is that you will only be able to load and in Delphi’s custom binary format, which makes it so much harder to work with high-end, industry standard, enterprise level solutions.

In the world of enterprise computing, methods typically take serialized objects as parameters. So instead of shipping in a ton of parameters – you ship in one string which contains an object exposing whatever properties you need.
Delphi does have such a system, buried deep with it’s RPC (remote procedure call) units — but the binary data cannot be made any better. It’s just base-64 encoded.

TMyClass = Class(TPersistent)
private
  FValue:Integer;
  FName: String;
Published
  Property Value:Integer read FValue write FValue;
  Property Name:String read FName write FName;
End;

As you see from the C# code example, C# has adopted anonymous field declarations. Meaning that you dont define a property field (the actual field to hold a property’s value) by name. It remains anonymous and you simply access the exposed property name. This is a great time saver and it makes sense when you think about it. Smart Pascal implements this, so as of writing SMS is the only object-pascal compiler which allows you to write near identical pascal which maps directly to C#. It also does this without importing weird C++ syntax (let’s face it, generics sticks out like a sore thumb in Delphi). So Smart Pascal is in some ways closer to C# than BCPL; BCPL being the language pascal inherited many ideas from back in the 70’s.

Now when you want to serialize your object, which simply means that you are able to save all published properties automatically to XML, JSON, binary or whatever emitter is available, under C# you would just write:

void saveObjToStream(TMyClass mObject) {
  /* Use an XML serializer */
  XmlSerializer ser = new XmlSerializer(typeof(TMyClass));

  /* Setup target buffer */
  MemoryStream mBuffer = new MemoryStream();

  /* Setup our stream-writer */
  TextWriter mWriter = new StreamWriter(mBuffer);

  /* Save object instance as XML to our memory stream */
  ser.Serialize(mWriter, mObject);
}

Reasonably straight forward; easy and effective. Delphi’s old TPersistent may be faster due to it’s binary format, but Delphi is suffering because of the binary-only technology which VCL represents. It would be easy to fix this for Embarcadero, but I guess they are focusing more on FMX these days.

Right, with the core .net “object” class implemented (see code below) we are now able to do something very similar:

procedure saveToStream(mObject:TMyClass)
var
  mSerializer: TMSXMLSerializer;
  mBuffer: TMemoryStream;
  mWriter: TMSTextWriter;
Begin
  mSerializer:=TMSXMLSerializer;
end;

This is very different from how Delphi has traditionally dealt with serialization. TPersistent dispatches the job of writing data onto the component itself. This is very effective when dealing with large trees of objects and sub-objects (although stack hungry for very large structures). But be that as it may, Delphi’s TWriter and TReader is a binary affair from beginning to end. Which means Delphi serialization (as Embarcadero shipts it) cant play ball with the big-boys who exclusively use XML (even for parameters in DLL’s or ORMS).

Manual serialization

While the .net framework has the simple “automatic” serialization technique i demonstrated above, which is suitable for web services, databases and remote procedure calls — the .net framework actually has 3 different persistent serialization engines.

The second version is more hands-on and functions pretty much like Delphi’s TPersistent does. With one exception and that is a proxy object is used to register properties manually; This is where the TMSSerializationInfo class comes in.

When manually using this variation you simply derive a new class from TMSObject and implement the ISerializable interface. The system will then call on the GetObjectData() when needed to obtain a property dictionary, then that dictionary is used to either stream out RTTI information (the properties defined in the dictionary) or write properties to an instance.

Well, enough blabber from me — he is the “work in progress” code so you can see for yourself. I will probably finish it laster at some point, I am working on Smart Mobile Code at the moment.

unit qtx.system;

interface

uses
      System.Sysutils,
      System.Classes,
      System.rtti,
      System.TypInfo,
      System.Generics.Collections;

type

  EQTXObject  = Class(Exception);

  (* Exception classes *)
  EQTXObjectAlreadyRetained = Class(EQTXObject);
  EQTXObjectNotRetained     = Class(EQTXObject);
  EQTXObjectRetained        = Class(EQTXObject);
  EQTXObjectCloneFailed     = Class(EQTXObject);
  EQTXObjectRTTIQueryFailed = Class(EQTXObject);

  (* Forward declarations *)
  TQTXObject                  = Class;
  TQTXPersistent              = Class;
  TQTXSerializationInfo       = Class;
  //TQTXObjectPropertyInfo      = Class;
  //TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList  = Class;

  TCharArray = packed array of char;
  TByteArray = packed array of byte;

  IDisposable = interface
    ['{56714944-F3D0-43C9-8C4B-F2F00BA5F83D}']
    procedure Dispose;
  end;

  IRetainedObject = Interface
    ['{27B152DC-6553-4309-8C51-2B5C7D89A9EB}']
    procedure RetainObject;
    procedure ReleaseObject;
  end;

  ICloneable = interface
    ['{6BAB94D0-32B9-4C4C-9D71-4C88AA9E6D0B}']
    function  Clone:TQTXObject;
  end;

  ISerializable = interface
    ['{FAD5405E-34B8-4264-8F8D-EE2A0D257213}']
    function  GetObjectData:TQTXSerializationInfo;
  end;

  TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList  = Class;

  TQTXObjectPropertyInfo = Class(TObject)
  private
    FName:      String;
    FDataType:  TTypeKind;
    FParent:    TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList;
  public
    Property    PropertyName:String read FName write FName;
    property    PropertyType:TTypeKind read FDataType write FDataType;
    function    asString:String;
    constructor Create(Parent:TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList);virtual;
  end;

  TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList  = class(TObjectList<TQTXObjectPropertyInfo>)
  private
    FInstance:    TQTXObject;
  public
    Property    Instance:TQTXObject read FInstance;
    function    ToString:String;override;
    constructor Create(Instance:TQTXObject);reintroduce;virtual;
  end;

  (* IRTTIProvider = interface
    ['{6C3113DE-BAFD-46D1-9596-C1397991F02F}']
    function  queryPropertyInfo(var aList:TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList):Boolean;
    function  getPropertyValue(aName:String;var data;buffLen:Integer):Boolean;
  end; *)  

  ISomeThing = Interface
    function  queryPropertyInfo(var aList:TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList):Boolean;
    function  getPropertyValue(aName:String;var Data:PByte;buffLen:Integer):Boolean;
  end;

  TQTXObject = Class(TPersistent,IRetainedObject)
  strict private
    FRefCount:  Integer;
    FRetained:    Boolean;
  public
    function queryPropertyInfo(var list:TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList):Boolean;
    function getPropertyValue(aName:String;
             var data:Pointer;
             var buffLen:Integer):Boolean;
  strict protected
    procedure CloneProperties(aSource,aTarget:TQTXObject;
              Recursive:Boolean=False);

    class function ElfHash(const aData;aLength:Integer):LongWord;overload;
    class function ElfHash(const aText:String):LongWord;overload;

  strict protected
    Property  RefCount:Integer read FRefCount;
  strict protected
    { IInterface }
    function _AddRef: Integer;virtual;stdcall;
    function _Release: Integer;virtual;stdcall;
  strict protected
    procedure RetainObject;virtual;
    procedure ReleaseObject;virtual;
  public
    function CloneMemberWise(var aClone):Boolean;

    procedure Finalize;virtual;

    class function  ReferenceEquals(const ObjA,ObjB:TQTXObject):Boolean;
    class function  GetHashCode:Longword;reintroduce;
    class function  GetType:TClass;

    function  ToString:String;override;

    Procedure Free;reintroduce;virtual;

  public
    function QueryInterface(const IID: TGUID; out Obj): HResult; virtual; stdcall;

    Procedure BeforeDestruction;Override;
    Procedure AfterConstruction;Override;
  end;

    (* See: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.runtime.serialization.serializationinfo(v=vs.110).aspx
       For member info
    *)
  TQTXSerializationInfo = Class(TQTXObject)
  end;  

  TQTXWriter = Class(TQTXObject)
  private
    FStream:  TStream;
  strict protected
    procedure   WriteBinary(const data;dataLen:Integer);
  public
    procedure   Write(value:Boolean);overload;virtual;
    procedure   Write(value:byte);overload;virtual;
    procedure   Write(value:TByteArray);overload;virtual;
    procedure   Write(value:char);overload;virtual;
    procedure   Write(value:TCharArray);overload;virtual;
    procedure   Write(value:String);overload;virtual;
    procedure   Write(value:Integer);overload;virtual;
    procedure   Write(value:word);overload;virtual;
    procedure   Write(Value:Longword);overload;virtual;
    procedure   Write(Value:double);overload;virtual;
    Procedure   Write(Value:Int64);overload;virtual;
    constructor Create(target:TStream);virtual;
    destructor  Destroy;Override;
  end;

  TQTXTextWriter = Class(TQTXWriter)
  strict protected
    Procedure   WriteText(value:String);
  public
    procedure   Write(value:Boolean);override;
    procedure   Write(value:byte);override;
    procedure   Write(value:TByteArray);override;
    procedure   Write(value:char);override;
    procedure   Write(value:TCharArray);override;
    procedure   Write(value:String);override;
    procedure   Write(value:Integer);override;
    procedure   Write(value:word);override;
    procedure   Write(Value:Longword);override;
    procedure   Write(Value:double);override;
    Procedure   Write(Value:Int64);override;
  end;

  TQTXReader = class(TQTXObject)
  end;

  TQTXTextReader = Class(TQTXReader)
  End;

  TQTXSerializer = Class(TQTXObject)
  public
    procedure Serialize(writer:TQTXWriter;const instance:TQTXObject);virtual;abstract;
    procedure DeSerialize(reader:TQTXReader;const instance:TQTXObject);virtual;abstract;
  end;

  TQTXXMLSerializer = Class(TQTXSerializer)
  public
    procedure Serialize(writer:TQTXWriter;const instance:TQTXObject);override;
    procedure DeSerialize(reader:TQTXReader;const instance:TQTXObject);override;
  end;

  TQTXBinarySerializer = Class(TQTXSerializer)
  End;

  TQTXPersistent = Class(TQTXObject,ICloneable,ISerializable)
  strict protected
    (* ICloneable *)
    function  Clone:TQTXObject;
  strict protected
    (* ISerializable *)
    function  GetObjectData:TQTXSerializationInfo;virtual;
  end;

implementation

class function TQTXObject.ElfHash(const aData;aLength:Integer):LongWord;
var
  i:    Integer;
  x:    Cardinal;
  FSrc: PByte;
Begin
  Result:=0;
  If aLength>0 then
  Begin
    FSrc:=@aData;
    for i:=1 to aLength do
    begin
      Result := (Result shl 4) + FSrc^;
      x := Result and $F0000000;
      if (x <> 0) then
      Result := Result xor (x shr 24);
      Result := Result and (not x);
      inc(FSrc);
    end;
  end;
end;

class function TQTXObject.ElfHash(const aText:String):LongWord;
var
  FAddr:  Pointer;
  FLen:   Integer;
Begin
  Result:=0;
  FLen:=Length(aText);
  If FLen>0 then
  Begin
    FAddr:=@aText[1];
    Result:=ElfHash(FAddr^,FLen * Sizeof(Char));
  end;
end;

//#############################################################################
// TQTXObjectPropertyInfo
//#############################################################################

constructor TQTXObjectPropertyInfo.Create(Parent:TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList);
begin
  inherited Create;
  FParent:=Parent;
end;    

function TQTXObjectPropertyInfo.asString:String;
var
  mStr:   String;
  mInt:   Integer;
  mInt64: Int64;
  mSize:  Integer;
  mPTR:   Pointer;
  mEnum:  longword;
  mVar:   Variant;
begin
  setLength(result,0);
  if FParent<>NIL then
  begin
    if FParent.Instance<>NIL then
    Begin

      case FDataType of
      tkString,
      tkLString,
      tkUString:
        Begin
          mSize:=0;
          repeat
            inc(mSize,1024);
            setLength(mStr,mSize);
            fillchar(mStr[1],mSize,#0);
            mPTR:=pointer(@mStr[1]);
          until FParent.Instance.getPropertyValue(FName,mPTR,mSize);
          result:=QuotedStr(strPas(PChar(mPTR)));
          setLength(mStr,0);
        end;
      tkInteger:
        Begin
          mPTR:=@mInt;
          mSize:=SizeOf(Integer);
          FParent.Instance.getPropertyValue(FName,mPTR,mSize);
          result:=IntToStr(mInt);
        end;
      tkInt64:
        Begin
          mPTR:=@mInt64;
          mSize:=SizeOf(Int64);
          FParent.Instance.getPropertyValue(FName,mPTR,mSize);
          result:=IntToStr(mInt64);
        end;
      tkEnumeration:
        Begin
          mPTR:=@mEnum;
          mSize:=SizeOf(Longword);
          FParent.Instance.getPropertyValue(FName,mPTR,mSize);
          if mSize=SizeOf(Boolean) then
          result:=boolToStr(PBoolean(mPTR)^,true) else
          Begin
            result:='[Enumeration]';
          end;
        end;
      tkVariant:
        Begin
          mPTR:=@mVar;
          mSize:=SizeOf(Variant);
          FParent.Instance.getPropertyValue(FName,mPTR,mSize);
          result:=string(mVar);
        end;
      end;

    end;
  end;
end;    

//#############################################################################
// TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList
//#############################################################################

constructor TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList.Create(Instance:TQTXObject);
Begin
  inherited Create(True);
  FInstance:=Instance;
end;    

function  TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList.ToString:String;
var
  x:  Integer;
Begin
  setLength(result,0);
  for x:=0 to Count-1 do
  Begin
    result:=result + Items[x].PropertyName + '=' + items[x].asString;
    if x<(count-1) then
    result:=result + #13;
  end;
end;

//#############################################################################
// TQTXXMLSerializer
//#############################################################################

procedure TQTXXMLSerializer.Serialize
          (writer:TQTXWriter;const instance:TQTXObject);
Begin
  if assigned(writer) then
  begin
    if assigned(instance) then
    Begin

    end;
  end;
end;

procedure TQTXXMLSerializer.DeSerialize
          (reader:TQTXReader;const instance:TQTXObject);
Begin
end;

//#############################################################################
// TQTXTextWriter
//#############################################################################

Procedure  TQTXTextWriter.WriteText(value:String);
Begin
  if length(value)>0 then
  Begin
    Value:=Value + #13#10;
    FStream.Write(value[1],length(value) * SizeOf(Char));
  end;
end;

procedure  TQTXTextWriter.Write(value:Boolean);
Begin
  WriteText(BoolToStr(value,true));
end;

procedure TQTXTextWriter.Write(value:byte);
Begin
  WriteText('$' + IntToHex(Value,2));
end;

procedure TQTXTextWriter.Write(value:TByteArray);
var
  x:  Integer;
Begin
  if length(value)>0 then
  for x:=low(value) to high(value) do
  Write(Value[x]);
end;

procedure TQTXTextWriter.Write(value:char);
Begin
  FStream.Write(Value,SizeOf(Char));
end;

procedure TQTXTextWriter.Write(value:TCharArray);
var
  x:  Integer;
Begin
  if length(Value)>0 then
  for x:=low(Value) to high(Value) do
  FStream.Write(Value[x],SizeOf(Char));
end;

procedure TQTXTextWriter.Write(value:String);
Begin
  WriteText(Value);
end;

procedure TQTXTextWriter.Write(value:Integer);
Begin
  WriteText(IntToStr(Value));
end;

procedure TQTXTextWriter.Write(value:word);
Begin
  WriteText('$' + IntToHex(Value,4));
end;

procedure TQTXTextWriter.Write(Value:Longword);
Begin
  WriteText('$' + IntToHex(Value,8));
end;

procedure TQTXTextWriter.Write(Value:double);
Begin
  WriteText(FloatToStr(Value));
end;

Procedure TQTXTextWriter.Write(Value:Int64);
Begin
  WriteText(IntToStr(value));
end;

//#############################################################################
// TQTXWriter
//#############################################################################

constructor TQTXWriter.Create(target:TStream);
Begin
  inherited Create;
  FStream:=target;
end;

destructor TQTXWriter.Destroy;
Begin
  inherited;
end;

procedure TQTXWriter.WriteBinary(const data;dataLen:Integer);
Begin
  FStream.Write(data,dataLen);
end;    

procedure TQTXWriter.Write(value:Boolean);
Begin
  WriteBinary(Value,sizeOf(Value));
end;

procedure TQTXWriter.Write(value:byte);
Begin
  WriteBinary(Value,sizeOf(Value));
end;

procedure TQTXWriter.Write(value:TByteArray);
Begin
  if length(value)>0 then
  WriteBinary(value,length(value));
end;

procedure TQTXWriter.Write(value:char);
Begin
  WriteBinary(Value,sizeOf(Value));
end;

procedure TQTXWriter.Write(value:TCharArray);
Begin
  if length(value)>0 then
  WriteBinary(Value,SizeOf(Char) * Length(Value));
end;

procedure TQTXWriter.Write(value:String);
Begin
  WriteBinary(Value,sizeOf(Value));
end;

procedure TQTXWriter.Write(value:Integer);
Begin
  WriteBinary(Value,sizeOf(Value));
end;

procedure TQTXWriter.Write(value:word);
Begin
  WriteBinary(Value,sizeOf(Value));
end;

procedure TQTXWriter.Write(Value:Longword);
Begin
  WriteBinary(Value,sizeOf(Value));
end;

procedure TQTXWriter.Write(Value:double);
Begin
  WriteBinary(Value,sizeOf(Value));
end;

Procedure TQTXWriter.Write(Value:Int64);
Begin
  WriteBinary(Value,sizeOf(Value));
end;

//#############################################################################
// TQTXPersistent
//#############################################################################

function  TQTXPersistent.GetObjectData:TQTXSerializationInfo;
begin
  result:=TQTXSerializationInfo.Create;
end;

function TQTXPersistent.Clone:TQTXObject;
var
  mClass: TClass;
begin
  result:=NIL;
  mClass:=getType;
  if mClass<>NIl then
  Begin
    (* Create instance *)
    result:=TQTXObject(mClass.Create);

    (* Do a recursive "deep-copy" of the object properties *)
    try
      cloneProperties(self,result,true);
    except
      on e: exception do
      begin
        freeAndNIL(result);
        Raise EQTXObjectCloneFailed.CreateFmt
        ('Failed to clone %s, method %s threw exception %s with message %s',
        [self.ClassType.ClassName,'Clone',e.ClassName,e.Message]);
      end;
    end;
  end;
end;      

//#############################################################################
// TQTXObject
//#############################################################################

Procedure TQTXObject.AfterConstruction;
begin
  inherited;
  AtomicDecrement(FRefCount);
end;

Procedure TQTXObject.BeforeDestruction;
Begin
  if RefCount <> 0 then
  Error(reInvalidPtr);

  Finalize;
  inherited;
end;    

Procedure TQTXObject.Free;
Begin
  if FRetained then
  Raise EQTXObjectRetained.Create
  ('Object is retained and cannot be released error');
  Inherited free;
end;    

function TQTXObject._AddRef: Integer;
begin
  Result := AtomicIncrement(FRefCount);
end;

procedure TQTXObject.RetainObject;
Begin
  (* Prevent automatic release through self-increment *)
  if not FRetained then
  FRetained:=_addRef>0 else
  raise EQTXObjectAlreadyRetained.Create
  ('Object is already marked as retained error');
end;

procedure TQTXObject.ReleaseObject;
Begin
  if FRetained then
  _release else
  raise EQTXObjectNotRetained.Create
  ('Object is not retained error');
end;    

function TQTXObject._Release: Integer;
begin
  (* Note: Delphi calls destroy directly, but since we want to
     be in tune with future possible changes to the VCL/FMX where
     free is expanded, I decided to invoke that instead *)
  Result := AtomicDecrement(FRefCount);
  if result<1 then
  free;
end;

function TQTXObject.QueryInterface(const IID: TGUID;out Obj): HResult;
const
  E_NOINTERFACE = HResult($80004002);
begin
  if GetInterface(IID, Obj) then
  Result := 0 else
  Result := E_NOINTERFACE;
end;

(* This is the dot net variation of "beforedestruction". I have included
   it for completeness and compatability only. It is invoked from
   beforedestruction. Also, this is where IDisposable is checked for *)
Procedure TQTXObject.Finalize;
var
  mAccess:  IDisposable;
begin
  (* Release unmanaged data *)
  if getInterface(IDisposable,mAccess) then
  mAccess.Dispose;
end;

function TQTXObject.ToString:String;
Begin
  result:=self.ClassType.ClassName;
end;    

class function TQTXObject.ReferenceEquals(const ObjA,ObjB:TQTXObject):Boolean;
Begin
  result:=(objA<>NIL)
  and (objB<>NIL)
  and (objA = objB);
end;    

class function TQTXObject.GetHashCode:longword;
begin
  result:=TQTXObject.ElfHash(ClassName);
end;    

class function TQTXObject.GetType:TClass;
var
  ctx: TRttiContext;
  objType: TRttiType;
begin
  result:=NIL;
  ctx := TRttiContext.Create;
  objType := ctx.GetType(ClassInfo);
  if (objType<>NIL)
  and (objType.AsInstance<>NIL) then
  result:=objType.AsInstance.ClassType;
end;                

function TQTXObject.getPropertyValue(aName:String;
         var Data:Pointer;
         var buffLen:Integer):Boolean;
var
  numProps, I : Integer;
  props: PPropList;
  PropInfo: PPropInfo;
  mInfo: TQTXObjectPropertyInfo;
  mText:  String;
  mLen: Integer;
Begin
  result:=False;

  if (Data<>NIL)
  and (BuffLen>0) then
  Begin

    numProps := GetPropList(self, props);
    try
      if numProps>0 then
      begin

        for i:=0 to numProps-1 do
        begin
          PropInfo := props^[I];

          if sameText(String(PropInfo^.Name),aName) then
          Begin
            case propInfo^.PropType^.Kind of
            tkInteger:
              Begin
                if BuffLen>=SizeOf(Integer) then
                Begin
                  Integer(data):=GetOrdProp(self,propinfo);
                  BuffLen:=SizeOf(Integer);
                end;
                break;
              end;
            tkChar:
              begin
                if BuffLen>=SizeOf(char) then
                Begin
                  PChar(data)^:=Char ( GetOrdProp(self,propinfo) );
                  BuffLen:=SizeOf(Char);
                end;
                break;
              end;
            tkEnumeration, tkSet, tkWChar:
              Begin

                if PropInfo^.PropType^ =  TypeInfo(boolean) then
                Begin
                  if BuffLen>=SizeOf(Boolean) then
                  begin
                    PBoolean(Data)^:=Boolean(GetOrdProp(self,propinfo));
                    BuffLen:=SizeOf(Boolean);
                    break;
                  end;
                end;

                if BuffLen>=SizeOf(longword) then
                Begin
                  PLongword(data)^:=GetOrdProp(self,propinfo);
                  BuffLen:=SizeOf(Longword);
                end;
                break;
              end;
            tkFloat:
              Begin
                if BuffLen>=SizeOf(Double) then
                Begin
                  PDouble(data)^:=GetOrdProp(self,propinfo);
                  BuffLen:=SizeOf(Double);
                end;
                break;
              end;
            tkString,
            tkLString,
            tkUString:
              begin
                mText:=GetStrProp(self,propinfo);
                mLen:=length(mText) * SizeOf(Char);
                if BuffLen>=mLen then
                Begin
                  move(mText[1],data^,mLen);
                  BuffLen:=mLen;
                end;
                break;
              end;

            tkInt64:
              Begin
                if BuffLen>=SizeOf(Char) * Length(mText) then
                Begin
                  PInt64(data)^:=GetInt64Prop(self,propinfo);
                  BuffLen:=SizeOf(Int64);
                end;
                break;
              end;

            tkVariant:
              begin
                if BuffLen>=SizeOf(variant) then
                Begin
                  PVariant(Data)^:=getVariantProp(self,PropInfo);
                  BuffLen:=SizeOf(Variant);
                end;
                break;
              end;

            (* tkInterface:
              begin
                break;
              end;

            tkMethod:
              Begin
                break;
              end; *)

            end;

          end;
        end;

        result:=(BuffLen>0);

      end;
    finally
      FreeMem(props);
    end;   

  end;

end;    

function TQTXObject.queryPropertyInfo
         (var list:TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList):Boolean;
var
  numProps, I : Integer;
  props: PPropList;
  PropInfo: PPropInfo;
  mInfo: TQTXObjectPropertyInfo;
Begin
  list:=NIL;
  result:=False;

  numProps := GetPropList(self, props);
  try
    if numProps>0 then
    begin
      list:=TQTXObjectPropertyInfoList.Create(self);

      for i:=0 to numProps-1 do
      begin
        PropInfo := props^[i];

        if not (PropInfo^.PropType^.Kind in
        [tkClass,tkArray,tkRecord,tkDynArray]) then
        Begin
          mInfo:=TQTXObjectPropertyInfo.Create(list);
          mInfo.PropertyName:=propInfo^.Name;
          mInfo.PropertyType:=PropInfo^.PropType^.Kind;
          list.Add(mInfo);
        end;
      end; 

      if list.Count<1 then
      freeAndNIL(list);

      result:=list<>NIL;

    end;
  finally
    FreeMem(props);
  end;
end;   

procedure TQTXObject.CloneProperties(aSource,aTarget:TQTXObject;
          Recursive:Boolean=False);
var
  numProps, I : Integer;
  props: PPropList;
  PropInfo: PPropInfo;
  src:  TObject;
  dst:  TObject;
Begin
  numProps := GetPropList(aSource, props );
  Try
    For I := 0 To numProps - 1 Do Begin
      PropInfo := props^[I];
      Case PropInfo^.PropType^.Kind Of
        tkInteger, tkChar, tkEnumeration, tkSet, tkWChar:
          SetOrdProp(aTarget,propinfo,GetOrdProp(aSource,propinfo));
        tkFloat:
          SetFloatProp(aTarget,propinfo,GetFloatProp(aSource,propinfo));
        tkString,
        tkLString,
        tkUString:
          SetStrProp( aTarget, propinfo,GetStrProp( aSource, propinfo));
        tkWString:
          SetWideStrProp(aTarget,propinfo,GetWideStrProp(aSource,propinfo));
        tkMethod:
          SetMethodProp(aTarget,propinfo,GetMethodProp(aSource,propinfo));
        tkInt64:
          SetInt64Prop(aTarget,propinfo,GetInt64Prop(aSource,propinfo));
        tkVariant:
          SetVariantProp(aTarget,propinfo,GetVariantProp(aSource,propinfo));
        tkInterface:
          SetInterfaceProp(aTarget,propinfo,GetInterfaceProp(aSource,propinfo));
        tkClass:
          Begin
            if Recursive then
            Begin

              src := GetObjectProp( aSource, propinfo );
              If Assigned( src ) Then
              Begin
                If src Is TComponent Then
                SetObjectProp( aTarget, propinfo, src ) else
                If src Is TPersistent Then
                Begin
                  if src<>self then
                  begin
                    dst := GetObjectProp( aTarget, propinfo, TPersistent);
                    if dst<>self then
                    begin
                      If Assigned( dst ) Then
                      TPersistent( dst ).Assign( TPersistent(src));
                    end;
                  end;
                End;
              End;

            end;
          End;
      tkArray,
      tkRecord,
      tkDynArray:
        begin
        end
      end;
    end;
  Finally
    FreeMem( props );
  End;
end;    

function TQTXObject.CloneMemberWise(var aClone):Boolean;
var
  mClass: TClass;
begin
  NativeInt(aClone):=0;
  result:=False;

  mClass:=getType;
  if mClass<>NIl then
  Begin
    TQTXObject(pointer(aClone)):=TQTXObject(mClass.Create);

    (* Do a recursive "deep-copy" of the object properties *)
    try
      cloneProperties(self,TQTXObject(pointer(aClone)),false);
    except
      on e: exception do
      begin
        freeAndNIL(result);
        Raise EQTXObjectCloneFailed.CreateFmt
        ('Failed to clone %s, method %s threw exception %s with message %s',
        [self.ClassType.ClassName,'CloneMemberWise',e.ClassName,e.Message]);
      end;
    end;
    //cloneProperties(self,TQTXObject(pointer(aClone)));
    result:=NativeInt(aClone)<>0;
  end;
end;    

end.