Archive
Linux: political correctness vs Gnu-Linux hacker spirit
Unless you have been living under a rock, the turmoil and crisis within the Linux community these past weeks cannot have escaped you. And while not directly connected to Delphi or the Delphi Developer group on Facebook, the effects of a potential collapse within the core Linux development team will absolutely affect how Delphi developers go about their business. In the worst possible scenario, should the core team and it’s immediate extended developers decide to walk away, their code walks with them. Rendering much of the work countless companies have invested in the platform unreliable at best – or in need of a rewrite at worst (there is a legal blind-spot in GPL revision 1 and 2, allowing developers to rescind their code).
Large parts of the kernel would have to be re-invented, a huge chunk of the sub-strata and bedrock that distributions like Ubuntu, Mint, Kali and others rests on – could risk being removed, or rescinded as the term may be, from the core repositories. And perhaps worst of all, the hundreds of patches and new features yet to be released might never see the light of day.
To underline just how dire the situation has been the past couple of weeks, Richard Stallman, Eric S. Raymond, Linus Torvalds and others are threatening, openly and legally, to pull all their code (September 20th, Linux Kernel Mailing List) if the bullying by a handful of activist groups doesn’t stop. Linus is still in limbo having accepted the code of conduct these activist demand implemented, but has yet to return to work.

Linus Torvalds is famous for many things, but his personality is not one of them
But the interesting part of the Linux debacle is not the if’s and but’s, but rather the methods used by these groups to get their way. How can you enforce a “code of conduct” using methods that themselves are in violation with that code of conduct? It really is a case of “do as I say, not as I do”; And it has escalated into a gutter fight masquerading as social warfare where slander, stigmata, false accusations and personal attacks of the worst possible type are the weapons. All of which is now having a real and tangible impact on business and technology.
Morally bankrupt actions is not activism
These activists, if they deserve that title, even went as far as deciding to dig into the sexual-life of one of the kernel developers. And when finding out that he was into BDSM (a form of sexual role-play), they publicly stigmatized the coder as a rape sympathizer (!). Not because it’s true, but because the verbal association alone makes it easier for bullies like Coraline to justify the social execution of a man in public.
What makes my jaw drop in all this, is the complete lack of compassion these so-called activists demonstrate. They seem blind to the price of such stigmata for the innocent; not to mention the insult to people who have suffered sexual abuse in their lives. For each false accusation of rape that is made, the difficulty for actual abuse victims to seek justice increases exponentially. It is a heartless, unforgivable act.
Personally, I can’t say I understand the many sexual preferences people have these days. I find myself googling what the different abbreviations mean. The movie 50 shades of gray revolved around this stuff. But one thing is clear: as long as there are consenting adults involved, it is none of our business. If there is evidence of a crime, then it should be brought before the courts. And no matter what we might feel about the subject at hand, it can never justify stigmatizing a person for the rest of his life. Not only is this a violation of the very code of conduct these groups wants implemented – it’s also illegal in most of the civilized world. And damn immoral and out-of-line if you ask me.
The goal cannot justify the means
The irony in all of this, is that the accusation came from Coraline herself. A transgender woman born in the wrong body; a furious feminist now busy fighting to put an end to bullying of transgender minorities in the workplace (which she claims is the reason she got fired from Github). Yet she has no problems being the worst kind of bully herself on a global scale. I question if Coraline is even morally fit to represent a code of conduct. I mean, to even use slander such as rape-sympathizer in context with getting a code of conduct implemented? Digging into someones personal life and then using their sexual preference as leverage? It is utterly outrageous!
It is unacceptable and has no place in civilized society. Nor does a code of conduct, beyond ordinary expectations of decency and tolerance, have any place in a rebel motivated R&D movement like Linux.
Linux is not Windows or OS X. It was born out of the free software movement back in the late 1960’s (Stallman with GNU) and the Scandinavian demo and hacker scene during the 80’s and 90’s (the Linux kernel that GNU rests on). This is hacker territory and what people might feel about this in 2018 it utterly irrelevant. These are people that start the day with 4Chan for pete sake! The primary motivation of Stallman and Linus is to undermine, destroy and bury Microsoft and Apple in particular. And they have made no secret of this agenda.
Expecting Linux or their makers to be politically correct is infantile and naive, because Linux is at its heart a rebellion, “a protest of technical excellence and access to technology undermining commercial tyranny and corporate slavery”. That is not my personal opinion, that is straight out of a Richard Stallman book Free as in Freedom; His papers reads more like a religious manifesto; a philosophical foundation for a technological utopia, seeded and influenced by the hippie spirit of the 1960s. Which is where Stallman’s heart comes from.
You cannot but admire Stallman for sticking to his principles for 50+ years. And thinking he is going to just roll over because activists in this particular decade has a beef with how hackers address each other or comment their code, well — I don’t think these activists understand the hacker community at all. If they did they would back off and stop poking dragons.
Linux vs the sensitivity movement?
Yesterday I posted a video article that explained some of this in simple, easy terms on Delphi Developer. I picked the video that summed up the absurdities involved (as outlined above) as quickly as possible, rather than some 80 minute talk on YouTube. We have a long tradition of posting interesting IT news, things that are indirectly connected with Delphi, C++ builder or programming in general. We also post articles that have no direct connection at all – except being headlines within the world of IT. This helps people stay aware of interesting developments, trends and potential investments.

The head of the “moral codex” doesn’t strike me as unbiased and without an axe to grind
As far as politics is concerned I have no interest what so ever. Nor would I post political material in the group because our focus is technology, Delphi, object pascal and software development in general. The exception being if there is a bill or law passed in the US or EU that affects how we build applications or handle data.
Well, this post was no different.
What was different was that some individuals are so acclimatized to political debate that they interpret everything as a political statement. So criticism of the methods used are made synonymous with criticism of a cause. This can happen to the best of us; human beings are passionate animals and I think we can all agree that politics has taken up an unusual amount of space lately. I can’t ever remember politics causing so much bitterness, divide and hate as it does today. Nor can I remember sound reason being pushed aside in favour of immediate emotional trends. And it really scares me.
Anyways, I wrote that “I stand by my god given rights to write obscene comments in my code“. Which is a reference to one of the topics Linus is being flamed for, namely his use of the F word in his own code. My argument is that, the kernel is ultimately Torvalds work, and it’s something he gives away for free. I dont have any need for obscenity in my code, but I sure as hell reserve the right to do so in my personal projects. How two external groups (in this case a very aggressive feminist group combined with LGBTQIA) should have any say in how Linus formats his code (or you for that matter) or the comments he writes – it makes no sense. It’s free, take it or leave it. And if you join a team and feel offended by how things are done, you either ignore it or leave.
It might not be appropriate of Linus to use obscenity in his comments, but do you really want people to tell you what you can or cannot write in your own code? Lord knows there are pascal units online that have language unfit for publishing, but nobody is forcing you to use them. I cant stand Java but I dont join their forums and sit there like a 12 year old bitching about how terrible Java is. It’s just infantile, absurd mentality.
So that is what my reference was to, and I took for granted that people would pick up on that since Linus is infamous for his spectacular rants in the kernel (and verbally in interviews). Some of his commits have more rants than code, which I find hilarious. There is a collection of them online and people read them for kicks because he is, for all means and purposes, the Gordon Ramsey of programming.
And I also made a reference to “tree hugging millennial moralists”. Not exactly hard-core statements in these trying times. We live in a decade where vegan customers are looking to sue restaurants for serving meat. Maybe I’m old-fashioned but for me, that is like something out of Monty Python or Mad Magazine. I respect vegans, but I will not be dictated by them.
I mean, the group people call millennials is after all recognized as a distinct generation due to a pattern of unreasonable demands on society (and in extreme cases, reality itself). In some parts of the world this is a real problem, because you have a whole generation that expects to bag upper-management salary on a paper route. When this is not met you face a tantrum and aggressiveness that should not exist beyond a certain age. Having a meltdown like a six-year-old when you are twenty-six is, well, not something I’m even remotely interested in dealing with.
And I speak from experience here, I had the misfortune of working with one extreme case for a couple of years. He had a meltdown roughly once a month and verbally abused everyone in the office. Including his boss. I still can’t believe he put up with it for so long, a lesser man would have physically educated him on the spot.
The sensitivity movement
But (and this is important) like always, a stereotype is never absolute. The majority within the millennial age group are nothing like these extreme cases. In fact we have two administrators in Delphi Developer that both fall under the millennial age group – yet they are the exact opposite of the stereotype. They are extremely hard-working, demonstrate good moral and good behavior, they give of themselves to the community and are people I am proud to call my friends.
The people I refer to as the sensitivity movement consists of men and women that hold, in my view, demands to life that are unreasonable. We live in times where for some reason, and don’t ask me why, minorities have gotten away with terrible things (slander, straw-men tactics, blame shifting, perversion of facts, verbal abuse, planting dangerous rumours and false accusation; things that can ruin a person for life) to impose their needs opposed to the greater good and majority. And no, this has nothing to do with politics, it has to do with expectation of normal decency and minding your own business. As a teenager I had my share of rebellion (some would say three shares), but I never blamed society; instead I wanted to understand why society was the way it is, which led me to studying history, comparative religion and philosophy.
The minorities of 2018 have no interest in understanding why, they mistake preference with offence, confuse kindness with weakness – and are painfully unable to discern knowledge from wisdom. The difference between fear and respect might be subtle, but on reflection a person should make important discoveries about their own nature. Yet this seem utterly lost on men and women in their 20s today.
And just to make things crystal clear: the minorities I am referring to here as the so-called sensitivity movement, are not the underprivileged or individuals suffering a disadvantage. The minorities are in fact highly privileged individuals – enjoying the very freedom of expression they so eagerly want taken away from people they don’t like. That is a very dangerous path.
Linux, the bedrock of the anti-establishment movement
The Linux community has a history of being difficult. Personally I find them both helpful and kind, but the core motivation behind Linux as a phenomenon cannot be swept under the carpet or ignored: these are rebels, rogues, people who refuse to bend the knee.
Linux itself is an act of defiance, and it exists due to two key individuals who both are extremely passionate by nature, namely Richard Stallman and Linus Torvalds.
Attacking these from all sides is shameful. I find no other words for it. Especially since its not a matter of principles or sound moral values, but rather a matter of pride and selfish ideals.
Name calling will not be tolerated
The reason I wrote this post was not to involve everyone in the dire situation of Linux, at least not to bring an external problem into our community and make it our problem. It was news that is of some importance.
I wrote this blogpost because a member somehow nicknamed me as “maga right-wing” something. And I’m not even sure how to respond to something like that.
First of all I have no clue what maga even is, I think it’s that cap slogan trump uses? Make america great again or something like that? Secondly, I live in Norway and know very little of the intricacies of domestic american politics. I have voted left for some 20 years, with exception of last norwegian election when I voted center. How my respect for Stallman and Linus, and how the hacker community operates (I grew up in the hacker community) – somehow connects me to some political agenda on another continent, is quite frankly beyond me.
But this is exactly the thing I wrote about above – the method being deployed by these groups. A person read something he or she doesn’t like, connects that to a pre-defined personality type, this is then supposed to justify wild accusations – and he or she then proceeded directly to treating someone accordingly. THAT behavior IS offensive to me, because there should be a dialog quite early in that chain of events. We have dialog to avoid causing harm – not as a means to cause further damage.
Is it the end of Linux as we know it?
No. Linus has been a loud mouth for ages, and he actually have people who purge his code of swear words (which is kinda funny) – but he has accepted the code of conduct and taken some time off.
The threat Stallman and the core team has made however is very real, meaning that the inner circle of Linux developers can flick the kill switch if they want to, but I think the negative press Coraline and those forcing their agenda onto the Linux foundation is getting, will make them regret it. And of course, articles like the New Yorker published didn’t help the situation.
Having said that, these developers are not normal people. Normal is a cut of average behavior. And neither Stallman, Linus of the hacker community fall under the term “normal” in the absolutesense of the word. Not a single individual that has done something of importance technologically fall under that group. Nor do they have any desire to be normal either, which is a death sentence in the hacker community. The lowest, most worthless status you can hold as a hacker, is normal.
These are people who build operating systems for fun. They are passion driven, artistic and highly emotional. And as such they could, should more gutter tricks be deployed, decide to burn the house down before they hand it over.
So it’s an interesting case well worth keeping an eye on. Preferably one that doesn’t add or subtract from what is there.
Help&Doc, documentation made easy
I have been flamed so much lately for not writing proper docs for Smart Mobile Studio, that I figured it was time to get this under wraps. Now in my defence I’m not the only one on the Smart Pascal team, sure I have the most noise, but Smart is definitely not a solo operation.
So the irony of getting flamed for lack of docs, having perpetually lobbied for docs at every meeting since 2014; well that my friend is mother nature at her finest. If you stick your neck out, she will make it her personal mission to mess you up.
So off I went in search of a good documentation system ..
The mission
My dilemma is simple: I need to find a tool that makes writing documentation simple. It has to be reliable, deal with cross chapter links, handle segments of code without ruining the formatting of the entire page – and printing must be rock solid.

Writing documentation in Open Office feels very much like this
If you are pondering why I even mention printing in this digital age, it’s because I prefer physical media. Writing a solid book, be it a mix between technical reference and user’s guide, can’t compare to a blog post. You need to let the material breathe for a couple of days between sessions to spot mistakes. I usually print things out, let it rest, then go over it with an old fashion marker.
Besides, my previous documentation suite couldn’t do PDF printing. I’m sure it could, just not around me. Whenever I picked Microsoft PDF printer as the output, it promptly committed suicide. Not even an exception, nothing, just “poff” and it terminated. The first time this happened I lost half a days work. The third time I uninstalled it, never to look back.
Another thing I would like to see, is that the program deals with graphics more efficiently than Google Docs, and at the very least more intuitively than Open Office (Oo in short). Now before you argue with me over Oo, let me just say that I’m all for Open-Office, it has a lot of great features. But in their heroic pursuit of cloning Microsoft to death, they also cloned possibly the worst layout mechanisms ever invented; namely the layout engine of Microsoft Word 2001.
Let’s just say that scaling and perspective is not the best in Open Office. Like Microsoft Word back in the day, it faithfully favours page-breaks over perspective based scaling. It will even flip the orientation if you don’t explicitly tell it not to.
Help & Doc
As far as I know, there are only two documentation suite’s on the market related with Delphi and coding. At least when it comes to producing technical manuals, help files and being written in Delphi.
First you have the older and perhaps more established Help & Manual. This is followed by the younger but equally capable Help & Doc. I ended up with the latter.
Both suite’s have more in common than similar names (which is really confusing), they offer pretty much the exact same functionality. Except Help & Doc is considerably cheaper and have a couple features that developers favour. At least I do, and I imagine the needs of other developers will be similar.
Being older, Help & Manual have worked up more infrastructure , something which can be helpful in larger organizations. But their content-management strategy is (at least to me) something of a paradox. You need more than .NET documentation and shared editing to justify the higher price -and having to install a CMS to enjoy shared editing? It might make sense if you are a publisher, ghostwriter or if you have a large department with 5+ people doing nothing but documentation; but competing against Google Documents in 2018? Sorry, I don’t see that going anywhere.
For me, Help & Doc makes more sense because it remains true to its basic role: to help you create documentation for your products. And it does that very, very well.
I also like that Help & Doc are crystal clear about their origins. Help & Manual have anonymized their marketing to tap into .Net and Java; they are not alone, quite a few companies try to hide the fact that their flagship product is written in object pascal. So you get a very different vibe from these two websites and their products.
The basics
Much like the competition, Help & Doc offers a complete WYSIWYG text editor with support for computed fields. So you can insert fields that hold variable data, like time, date (and various pieces of a full datetime), project title, author name [and so on]. I hope to see script support at some point here, so that a script could provide data during PDF/Web generation.
The editor is responsive and well written, supports tables, margins and formatting like you expect from a modern editor. Not really sure how much I need to write about a text editor, most Delphi and C++ developers have high standards and I suspect they have used RichView, which is a well-known, high quality component.
One thing I found very pleasing is that fonts are not hidden away but easily accessible; various text styles hold a prominent place under the Write tab on top of the window. This is very helpful because you don’t have to apply a style to see how it will look, you can get an idea directly from the preview.
Being able to insert conditional sections is something I found very easy. It’s no doubt part of other offerings too, but I have never really bothered to involve myself. But with so many potential targets, mobile phones, iPads, desktops, Kindle – suddenly this kind of functionality becomes a thing.
For example if you have documentation for a component, one that targets both Delphi, .NET and COM (yes people still use COM believe it or not) you don’t need 3 different copies of the same documentation – with only small variations between them. Using the conditional operations you can isolate the differences.
With Apple OSX, iOS and Android added to the compiler target (for Delphi), the need to separate Apple only instructions on how to use a library [for example], and then only include that for the Apple output is real. Windows and Linux can have their own, unique sections — and you don’t need to maintain 3 nearly similar documentation projects.
When you combine that with script support, Help & Doc is flexing some powerful muscles. I’m very much impressed and don’t regret getting this over the more expensive Help and Manual. Perhaps it would be different if I was writing casual books for a publisher, or if I made .NET components (oh the humanity!) and desperately needed to please Visual Studio. But for a hard-core Delphi and object pascal developer, Help & Doc has everything I need – and then some!
Wait, what? Script support?
Scripting docs
One of the really cool things about Help & Doc is that it supports pascal scripting. You can do some pretty amazing things with a script, and being able to iterate through the documentation in classical parent / child relationships is very helpful.

The central role of Object Pascal is not exactly hidden in Help & Doc
If you are wondering why a script engine would even be remotely interesting for an author, consider the following: you maintain 10-12 large documentation projects, and at each revision there will be plenty of small and large changes. Things like class-names getting a new name. If you have mentioned a class 300 times in each manual, changing a single name is going to be time-consuming.
This is where scripting is really cool because you can write code that literates through the documentation, chapter by chapter, section by section, paragraph by paragraph – and automatically replace all of them in a second.
I haven’t spent a huge amount of time with the scripting API Help & Doc offers yet (more busy writing), but I imagine that a plugin framework is a natural step in its evolution. I made a desktop search engine once, back between 1999 and 2005 (just after the bronze age) where we bolted Pascal Script into the system, then implemented each search engine parser as a script. This was very flexible and we could adapt to changes faster than our competitors.
While I can only speculate and hope the makers of Help & Doc reads this, creating an API that gives you a fair subset of Delphi (streams, files, string parsing et-al) that is accessible from scripts, and then defining classes for import scripts, export scripts, document processing scripts; that way developers can write their own import code to support a custom format (medical documentation springs to mind as an example). Likewise developers could write export code.
This is a part of the software I will explore more in the weeks to come!
Verdict – is it worth it?
As of writing you get Help & Doc professional at 249 €, and you can pick up the standard edition for 99€. Not exactly an earth shattering price for the mountain of work involved in creating such an elaborate system. If you factor in how much time it saves you: yes, why on earth would you even think twice!
I have yet to find a function that their competition offers that would change my mind. As a developer who is part of a small team, or even as a solo developer – documentation has to be there. I can list 10.000 reasons why Smart never got the documentation it deserves, but at least now I can scratch one of them off my list. Writing 500 A4 pages in markdown would have me throwing myself into the fjords at -35 degrees celsius.
And being the rogue that I am, should I find intolerable bugs you will be sure to hear about them — but I have nothing to complain about here.
Its one of the most pleasant pieces of software I have used in a long time.
Human beings and licenses
Before I end this article, I also want to mention that Help & Doc has a licensing system that surprised me. If you buy 2 licenses for example, you get to link that with a computer. So you have very good control over your ownership. Should you run out of licenses, well then you either have to relocate an existing license or get a new one. You are not locked out and they don’t frag you with compliance threats.

Doesn’t get much easier than this
I use VMWare a lot and sometimes forget that I’m running a clone on top of a clone, and believe me I have gotten some impressive emails in the past. I think the worst was Xamarin Mono which actually deactivated my entire environment until I called them and explained I was doing live debugging between two VMWare instances.
So very cool to see that you can re-allocate an existing license to whatever device you want without problems.
To sum up: worth every penny!
HexLicense, Patreon and all that
Apparently using modern service like Patreon to maintain components has become a point of annoyance and confusion. I realize that I formulated the initial HexLicense post somewhat vague and confusing, in retrospect I will admit that and also take critique for not spending a little more time on preparations.
Having said that, I also corrected the mistake quickly and clarified the situation. I feel some of the comments have been excessively critical for something that, ultimately, is a service to the community. But I’ll roll with the punches and let’s just put this issue to bed.
From the top please
I have several products and frameworks that naturally takes time to maintain and evolve. And having to maintain websites, pay for tax and invoicing services, pay for hosting (and so on), well it consumes a lot of hours. Hours that I can no longer afford to spend (my work at Embarcadero must come first, I have a family to support). So Patreon is a great way to optimize a very busy schedule.
Today developers solve a lot of the business strain by using Patreon. They make their products open source, but give those that support and help fund the development special perks, such as early access, special builds and a more direct line of control over where the different projects and sub-projects are heading.
The public repository that everyone has access to is maintained by pushing the code on interval, meaning that the public “free stuff” (LGPL v3 license) will be some months behind the early-access that patrons enjoy. This is common and the same approach both large and small teams go about things in 2018. Quite radical compared to what we “old-timers” are used to, but that’s how things work now. I just go with flow and try to do the most amount of good on the journey.
Benefits of Patreon
The benefits are many, but first and foremost it has to do with time. Developer don’t have to maintain 3-4 websites, pay for invoicing services on said products, pay hosting fees and rent support forums — instead focus is on getting things done. So instead of an hour here and there, you can (based on the level of support) allocate X hours within a week or weekend that are continuous.

Patreon solves two things: time and cost
Everyone wins. Those that support and help fund the projects enjoy early access and special builds. The community at large wins because the public repository is likewise maintained, albeit somewhat behind the cutting edge code patrons enjoy. And the developers wins because he or she doesn’t have to run around like a mad chicken maintaining X number of websites -wasting more time doing maintenance than building cool new features.
And above all, pricing goes down. By spreading the cost over a larger base of interest, people get access to code that used to cost $200 for $35. The more people that helps out, the more the cost can be reduced per tier.
To make it crystal clear what the status of my frameworks and component packages are, here is a carbon copy from HexLicense.com
For immediate release
Effective immediately HexLicense is open-source, released under the GNU Lesser General Public License v3. You can read the details of that license by clicking here.
Patreon model
In order to consolidate the various projects I maintain, I have established a Patreon account. This means that people can help fund further development on HexLicense, LDEF, Amibian and various Delphi libraries as a whole. This greatly simplifies things for everyone.
I will be able to allocate time based on a broader picture, I also don’t need to pay for invoicing services, web hosting and more. This allows me to continue to evolve the components and code, but without so many separate product identities to maintain.
Patreon supporters will receive updates before anyone else and have direct access to the latest code at all times. The public bitbucket repository will be updated on interval, but will by consequence be behind the Patreon updates.
Further security
One of the core goals on Patreon is the evolution of a bytecode compiler. This should be of special interest to HexLicense users. Being able to compile modules that hackers will be unable to debug gives you a huge advantage. The engine is designed so that the instruction-set can be randomized for a particular build. Making it unique for your application.

The LDEF assembler prototype running under Smart Mobile Studio
Well, I want to thank everyone involved. It has been a great journey to produce so many components, libraries and solutions over the years – but now it’s time for me to cut down on the number of projects and focus on core technology.
HexLicense with the update license files will be uploaded to BitBucket shortly.
Sincerly
Jon Lennart Aasenden
You must be logged in to post a comment.